Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2022 Year 2022 This

Revision u/s 263 to impose a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT merely ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

February 21, 2022

Revision u/s 263 to impose a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT merely set aside the assessment order in its entirety and remanded the case for a fresh consideration by the assessing officer - Thus, while issuing the order of assessment the assessing officer was bestowed with all powers as in an original assessment, including the power to express his satisfaction for initiating penalty proceedings. - Writ petition dismissed - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The assessment order passed u/s 153C was erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interest. The Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271AAC instead of...

  2. Revision u/s 263 - AO not initiated Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessment order passed u/s 143(3)is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue - Ld. PCIT was...

  3. Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

  4. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

  5. Levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since no specific satisfaction has been recorded by the Ld. Assessing Officer either in the body of the assessment order or in the show...

  6. Revision u/s 263 - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) dropped - voluntarily offer certain income in the form of cash deposits/FDRs - a perusal of the ‘order sheet’ noting of the A.O...

  7. Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

  8. To impose penalty u/s 271(1)(c), willful concealment is not an essential ingredient - HC

  9. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Without proper verification of documents of the assessee, only to remand the matter to the ld. AO ‘for verification’ which is vitiated the...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - mere direction in the assessment order to initiate penalty proceedings - Concealment/furnishing inaccurate...

  11. Revision u/sec. 263 - CIT has exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

  12. Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

  13. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

  14. Revision u/s 263 - unexplained investments - non-initiation of penalty u/s u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act render the order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the...

  15. Revision u/s 263 - penalty proceedings u/s 271AAB(1A) - The mandate under section 263 of the Act do not give any power to CIT to impose his satisfaction over the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates