Period of limitation - Filing of appeal - apparently there was ...

Order Not Properly Served, Hindering Appeal u/s 85; Emphasizes Good Faith in Legal Proceedings.

March 8, 2022

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Period of limitation - Filing of appeal - apparently there was no proper service of the impugned order dated 31-01-2018 passed by the Original Authority/Assessing Authority upon the petitioner, so as to enable him to prefer an appeal before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) in accordance with Section 85 of the Act 1994. - The Hon’ble Supreme Court in catena of decisions has categorically held, that the rules of limitation are not meant to destroy the rights of the parties. The Courts are only required to ensure that, a litigant has not to take resort to dilatory tactics and has approached the Court bonafidely. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Period of limitation - Filing of appeal - apparently there was ...

Order Not Properly Served, Hindering Appeal u/s 85; Emphasizes Good Faith in Legal Proceedings.

March 8, 2022

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

Proceedings initiated u/s 144C - legality of the order by framing the so-called draft assessment order - while framing the said draft assessment order, the AO not only...

Reopening proceedings against deceased assessee - proceedings against legal representatives of the deceased assessee - The High court observed that the legal...

Validity of order passed u/s. 147 against deceased assessee - Citing Section 159(2) of the Act and judicial precedents, the Tribunal emphasized that no order can be...

Validity of action taken by the GST officers in Good Faith - Expunging a Portion of the High Court's Interim Order - The Supreme Court granted leave and accepted the...

Classification of the imported goods - ‘Activity trackers’ - rate of duty - Legal Niceties in Classification - The Tribunal observes deficiencies in the adjudicating...

Reassessment u/s 147 - improper service of notice u/s 148 - A notice was served at the registered office of the assessee company. The server of the department has...

Benami transaction - possession of a significant amount of cash - Validity of summoning order - The High Court found merit in the applicant's arguments, emphasizing the...

HC quashed an ex parte order and related tax notifications due to absence of digital or scanned signatures on both show cause notice (SCN) and final order. Following...

Validity of assessment order - alleged discrepancies in returns filed by the petitioner - The case involved a challenge to an assessment order by a petitioner in the...

The Punjab and Haryana High Court addressed the legal right of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) to challenge auction proceedings of properties owned by the HUF. The court...

Arbitral Proceedings - Computation of one-year period for completing the proceedings - exclusion of days during which the proceedings were stayed - The High Court...

Proceedings against importer when the sole proprietor of M/s Ganpati Enterprises had expired - mis -declaration and short payment of duty - imposition of penalty on...

Dishonour of Cheque - Effect of arbitration proceedings - The High Court referred to a Supreme Court judgment which clarified that arbitration proceedings and...

Assessment proceedings against one of the legal heirs - deceased/assessee had admittedly more than one legal representatives - Despite the legal heir's explicit...

ITAT ruled that notice under section 143(2) issued in the name of deceased assessee Smt. S was invalid, despite participation of legal heirs in assessment proceedings....

Quick Updates: