Validity of the orders passed by the first appellant u/s 92CA ...

Court Rules Orders u/s 92CA(3) of Income Tax Act Barred by Limitation; Deadline Clarified as October 31, 2019.

April 18, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Validity of the orders passed by the first appellant u/s 92CA (3) on the ground of limitation as contemplated u/s 153 of the Act - Scope of the work "may" - The word “may” is used there to imply that an order can be passed any day before 60 days and it is not that the order must be made on the day before the 60th day. The impact of the proviso to the sub-section clarifies the mandatory nature of the time schedule. The word “may” cannot be interpreted to say that the legislature never wanted the authority to pass an order within 60 days and it gave a discretion. Therefore, the learned Judge rightly held the orders impugned in the writ petitions as barred by limitation, as the Board, in the Central Action Plan, has specified 31.10.2019 as the date on which orders are to be passed by the TPO, reiterating the time limit to be mandatory. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of the orders passed by the first appellant u/s 92CA ...

Court Rules Orders u/s 92CA(3) of Income Tax Act Barred by Limitation; Deadline Clarified as October 31, 2019.

April 18, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision that assessment order under s.143(3) r.w.s. 144C(3) r.w.s. 144B was time-barred. TPO reference under s.92CA(1) was made on 13.09.2021, with...

Validity of TP order stating that the orders are passed u/s 92CA (3) - Period of limitation - 60 days period from 31/3/2015 expires on 29 January 2015. But the ld TPO...

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

The Transfer Pricing Officer's order was held invalid as it was issued beyond the time limit prescribed u/s 92CA(3A) of the Act read with Section 153. The ITAT ruled...

NCLAT addressed the computation of limitation periods for filing appeals under IBC. The tribunal held that while the 30-day limitation period under Section 61 can be...

Maintainability of appeal - failure to submit certified copy of the order - extension of period of time limitation - compliance of the rules of natural justice or not -...

Validity of order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 92CA without passing draft order of assessment - eligibility of assessee - once TPO passed order u/s 92CA, assessee is an...

The Rajasthan High Court examined the validity of revision proceedings u/s 263 concerning the period of limitation. The issue was whether the period of limitation for...

Valuation of imported goods - Admittedly, it is evident on the face of the record that deductive value was available before the Court below which have not been rejected...

Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - AO opined that banker’s cheques were not covered in any of the provisions of Rule 6DD of the Income Tax Rules as they were the account payee...

Validity of order passed u/s 92CA - Transfer Pricing - Since the ld. TPO order has been passed on 30/10/2015 which is clearly barred by limitation by one day by virtue...

The High Court held that respondent No. 3 cannot avoid deciding the petitioners' application dated 20 December 2023 seeking an advance ruling on the taxability of sale...

Refusal to rectify the assessment order passed under Rule 142 (5) of the C.G.S.T. Rules, 2017 - denial of the Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The High Court found merit in the...

CENVAT Credit - Removal of capital goods - Depreciation - Deduction of 2.5% to be applied from the date of availing credit, not from the date of receiving or putting to...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Quick Updates: