Validity of the orders passed by the first appellant u/s 92CA ...

Case Laws Income Tax

April 18, 2022

Validity of the orders passed by the first appellant u/s 92CA (3) on the ground of limitation as contemplated u/s 153 of the Act - Scope of the work "may" - The word “may” is used there to imply that an order can be passed any day before 60 days and it is not that the order must be made on the day before the 60th day. The impact of the proviso to the sub-section clarifies the mandatory nature of the time schedule. The word “may” cannot be interpreted to say that the legislature never wanted the authority to pass an order within 60 days and it gave a discretion. Therefore, the learned Judge rightly held the orders impugned in the writ petitions as barred by limitation, as the Board, in the Central Action Plan, has specified 31.10.2019 as the date on which orders are to be passed by the TPO, reiterating the time limit to be mandatory. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of the orders passed by the first appellant u/s 92CA ...

Case Laws Income Tax

April 18, 2022

You may also like:

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153(1) - Period of limitation - In this case, since, the Assessing Officer cannot invoke jurisdiction u/s.144C(1) and pass draft...

Validity of TP order stating that the orders are passed u/s 92CA (3) - Period of limitation - 60 days period from 31/3/2015 expires on 29 January 2015. But the ld TPO...

Validity of TP order - Period of limitation - Computation period of 60 days given by the taxpayer cannot be faulted with on any ground because from 26.02.2022, the date...

Validity of order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 92CA without passing draft order of assessment - eligibility of assessee - once TPO passed order u/s 92CA, assessee is an...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Earlier, ITAT remanded the matter back requesting the AO to provide reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings. - AO must have...

Period of limitation for palling an order passed by the TPO u/s 92CA (3) read with section 153 - Computation of period of 60 days given by the taxpayer extracted in the...

Transfer Pricing Adjustments - Validity of the order passed u/s. 92CA(3) - period of limitation - 60 days have to be counted prior to the date of last date of limitation...

Detention order - challenge on the short ground that the impugned proceedings are barred by the limitation prescribed under Section 129(3) of the GST Act, 2017 - the...

The case involves the validity of a final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 144(C)(3) beyond the period of limitation. The Dispute Resolution...

Validity of order passed u/ss 154/147/143(3) - Disallowance of prior period expenses - Relevant previous year being first year of assessee's business, no prior period...

Revision u/s 263 - Validity of order passed by the AO as per the direction of the Settlement Commission u/s.254D(4) - The order passed by the ld. AO u/s.143(3) r.w.s....

Rectification order passed u/s.154 - Period of limitation - In the present case before us there is no controversy about first order or second order but order under...

Validity of order u/s 92CA - time limit for passing of the TPO order - period of limitation - despite the fact that the reference made to the Ld. TPO is valid, in...

Prevention Detention Order - Smuggling of gold - the order of detention passed for more than two grounds and if one of the grounds is not applicable or vague or...

The case pertains to the challenge to assessment orders passed by the Assessing Officer for the assessment years 2007-2008 to 2009-2010 on the grounds of time limitation...

Quick Updates: