Simply because the authorities who are expected to enforce the ...

Failure to Enforce Law Doesn't Excuse Ignoring Statutory Rules.

January 5, 2013

Case Laws Customs HC

Simply because the authorities who are expected to enforce the law are unable to enforce effectively, it does not mean that the statutory provision must be given a go bye - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Simply because the authorities who are expected to enforce the ...

Failure to Enforce Law Doesn't Excuse Ignoring Statutory Rules.

January 5, 2013

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

Penalty levied u/s. 272A (1)(c) - non compliance with summons issued under section 131(1A) - ignorance of law is certainly no excuse for a default committed but, at the...

Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules,2004 – Clearance of goods to SEZ - The substituted sub-rule 6(6Xi) is enforced from the date the 2004-Rules came into force - AT

Condonation of delay denied - Ignorance of law is no excuse - HC

Condonation of delay – Ignorance of law is not an excuse - delay not condoned - AT

HC ruled that GST registration cancellation proceedings can be dropped if the registered person files pending returns and makes full tax payment with interest and late...

HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

Penalty u/s. 271F - non- filing of ITR - Reasonable cause for failure - assessee is an Advocate by profession and is also a partner in a law firm - ignorance of law is...

Demand of KGST when the resolution plan was approved - Jurisdiction and applicability of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) over statutory dues. The court...

Power of tribunal to review application - It is the well laid down proposition of law that ‘in the absence of any power of ‘Review’ or ‘Recall’ vested with the...

Goods and services tax - Acts, Rules, Statutory provisions

Place of provision of service - Export of services or not - POPOS Rules - while relying on Rule 2(i)(b)(ii) the revenue ignores the existence of Rule 2(i)(b)(i) while...

Valuation of export goods - While the rejection of the transaction value under Rule 8 by the lower authority is correct, determining the value under Rule 6, ignoring...

Forfeiture of the earnest money deposit by the appellant bank - The Supreme Court held that, the underlying principle envisaged u/s(s) 73 & 74 of the Indian Contract...

The key legal issues and holdings in this case are: 1. Valuation of clinkers transferred by the appellant to their sister concern should be done u/r 4 read with Rule 11...

TDS u/s 194C - non-deduction of tax at source on railway siding charges and demurrage charges - Where the law creates a duty or charge and the party is disabled to...

Quick Updates: