Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue - There was a failure ...

Case Laws Income Tax

January 12, 2013

Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue - There was a failure on the part of the AO to make such enquiry in order to ascertain the nature of the expenses whether capital or revenue, thus the order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue - There was a failure ...

Case Laws Income Tax

January 12, 2013

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of...

The AO's order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue's interests. The filing fee for increasing share capital was rightly allowed as revenue expenditure,...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - An incorrect assumption of the fact or an incorrect application of law will satisfy the requirement of the order being erroneous. The phrase...

The ITAT addressed a case involving revision u/s 263 where the main allegation was the non-disclosure of agricultural income affecting the deduction u/s 54B. The...

Case involved revision u/s 263 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) setting aside assessment order regarding rent recovered from specified persons and treatment of...

Revision u/s 263 - revenue failed to bring on record that the order passed by the AO was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue - This is a case of...

The Commissioner's invocation of Section 263 for revision of the assessment order was unjustified as the twin conditions of the order being erroneous and prejudicial to...

Revision u/s 263 - an order prejudicial and erroneous to the revenue - though the order passed by the A.O. is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue but it is not...

AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

Revision u/s 263 - Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an...

Revision u/s 263 - CIT setting aside the second reassessment order - time limit to take action u/s 263 - the necessity for the Commissioner to have substantial grounds...

Issue of reassessment u/s 263, where the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) upheld the reassessment as erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interest for verification...

Revision u.s 263 - assessment order passed pursuant to the revisionary order has resulted in reduction of tax liability - not prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue...

Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous or prejudicial of revenue - AO allowed the Exemption u/s. 10(34) - Insurance business - Dividend income - The order passed by the AO...

Revision u/s 263 - revision based on the audit objection - borrowed satisfaction - The ITAT noted that the AO had called for details and evidence from the appellant and...

Quick Updates: