Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2022 Year 2022 This

Rectification of mistake - Calculation of correct Fe content - ...


Supreme Court Guidelines Stress: Rectifying Errors in Iron Ore Fe Content Calculation u/s 154 Ignored by Appellate Authority.

August 1, 2022

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Rectification of mistake - Calculation of correct Fe content - Iron Ore Fines - The correct Fe content was required to be determined on the basis of the guidelines contained in the judgement of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gangadhar Narsingdas Aggarwal - It is the settled position of law that not following the order of the Hon’ble High Court or the Hon’ble Apex Court would amount to mistake/error which is rectifiable under the provisions of Section 154 ibid. It is strange that in the second round and in the impugned order, the First Appellate Authority has ignored its own earlier order which has attained finality and thereby sustained a tangential order of lower authority. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. CESTAT allowed the appeal against denial of rectification under Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962, holding that the accidental omission by the assessing officer in...

  2. The CESTAT set aside the impugned order, ruling that the failure to consider relevant judicial pronouncements and circulars while finalizing Shipping Bills constituted a...

  3. Clandestine Removal - melting scrap - excess input output ratio - shortage of finished goods - The said input-output ratio cannot remain fixed due to variable factors...

  4. Determination of method by which the iron (Fe) content in the iron ore - there is a reason for the Revenue to do so inasmuch as when the legislature has found it...

  5. Shipping bill assessment challenged regarding determination of Fe content in Iron Ore Fines for classification and duty rate. Fe percentage to be determined on Wet...

  6. Confiscation of goods already exported - redemption fine in lieu of confiscation imposed - export of iron ore fines - Fe content of the iron ore fines - In a case where...

  7. Interpretation of statute - Power of refund authority to rectify error committed by the importer - Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962 - clerical error or arithmetical...

  8. Appellant exported 15,000 MT of iron ore with 58.61% Fe content on WMT basis. Customs duty was provisionally paid at Rs. 300/PMT instead of applicable rate of Rs. 50/PMT...

  9. The case involved the determination of Fe content for export duty purposes. The Tribunal upheld that Fe content should be calculated on Wet Metric Ton (WMT) basis as per...

  10. Deduction u/s 10B - activity the Assessee undertakes amount to manufacturing or processing to entail it to the benefit or not? - True, very low-grade iron ore cannot be...

  11. The case involved the classification of Iron Ore fines as Iron Ore lumps for export valuation and levy of export duty. The Tribunal held that the consignment, despite...

  12. Exemption from CVD - Classification of imported goods - Iron Ore (fines) or Iron Ore (concentrate) - The process of crushing and screening undertaken on the Iron Ore...

  13. Rectification u/s 154 - addition u/s 69 r.w.s. 115BBE - disallowing 30% of the expenditure pertaining to salary, rent, contract and professional fee as per Section 40...

  14. CESTAT ruled that separate shipping bills for goods exported in a single vessel must be assessed individually, not collectively, under the Customs Act. The tribunal...

  15. Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - tax paid on more than one occasion, and claims its refund u/s 154 - The High Court referred to Article 265 of the Constitution of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates