Deduction u/s 80IB - The methodology adopted by the assessee for ...

Taxpayer's Expense Apportionment Method Deemed Reasonable u/s 80IB; Consistency Settles Deductions Issue.

August 5, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Deduction u/s 80IB - The methodology adopted by the assessee for apportionment of common head office expenses and selling expenses has consistently been followed year-on-year basis which has been held to be reasonable and scientific. It is thus noted that the issue in hand before us is no longer res integra considering the decisions in assessee’s own case. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Deduction u/s 80IB - The methodology adopted by the assessee for ...

Taxpayer's Expense Apportionment Method Deemed Reasonable u/s 80IB; Consistency Settles Deductions Issue.

August 5, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

STP unit - Exemption u/s 10A - Method of allocation of Common expenses - Turnover method is to be applied in case for apportionment of profits but here we are concerned...

Apportionment of expenses to determine the Foreign Income for the purposes of deduction u/s 80-O - method of apportionment of expenses between domestic business and...

Quantum of the household expenses - the assessee has not furnished any information qua to the household expenses. Thus there remains no alternate except to estimate the...

Tax authority rejected rectification application filed by taxpayer for zero-rated supply citing violation of principles of natural justice. Court examined impugned...

ITAT partially allowed taxpayer's appeal against additions made under Section 68 and Section 56(2)(viib) of Income Tax Act. Tribunal held that taxpayer adequately...

Addition under the head of Vehicle Running Expenses and Repairs & Maintenance - "exaggerated expense' or "not reasonable expense". - The onus is on the Revenue to...

Assessment u/s 153C - disallowance made u/s 37. Assessing Officer observed no supporting evidence for claimed expenses furnished by assessee and non-cooperation during...

Deduction claimed u/s 57 against income returned u/s 56 - manner of apportioning assessee's expenses to earning income u/s 56 disputed - Revenue authorities rejecting...

ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision favoring the assessee on multiple disputed deductions. The City Environment Expenses were allowed as sunk costs incurred for development of...

The ITAT delivered a comprehensive ruling addressing multiple tax issues. The key outcome was favorable to the taxpayer on several counts: deduction under section...

Computation of deduction u/s 80IB(9) - there is no scope to adjust expenses relating to other “undertakings” while computing deduction u/s 80IB(9) of the Act.

The assessee was entitled to follow the 'project completion method' consistently for recognizing revenue, as it had not achieved the minimum threshold for applying the...

TP adjustment - ALP determination - Selection or change in Most Appropriate Method (MAM) - “Other Method" v/s "CUP Method" - Assessee can resile from the most...

Addition u/s.56(2)(vii)(b) - share premium - difference between the issue price and the actual share price determined by the AO - AO has changed the method of valuation...

Transfer pricing issues: Royalty arrangement including trademark, know-how upheld based on CUP method over TNMM. Advertisement expenses remanded for fresh determination....

Quick Updates: