Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2022 Year 2022 This

Extended period of limitation - Suppression of facts or not - ...


Extended Limitation Period Not Applicable: No Evidence of Fact Suppression or Intent to Evade Duty by Appellant.

August 22, 2022

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Extended period of limitation - Suppression of facts or not - The returns contained all the requisite details as that of the invoice numbers, the amount of invoice, the amount of service tax etc. Nothing has stopped Department to look into those invoices - the allegation of suppression of facts against the appellant are without any basis. Accordingly the foremost reason for invoking the extended period of limitation remains not available with the Department. Otherwise also the onus is always upon the Department to prove the alleged misrepresentation or suppression of fact that too with an intent to evading duty - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Extended period of limitation - It is clear that even when an assessee has suppressed facts, the extended period of limitation can be invoked only when “suppression’ is...

  2. The key points are: Appropriation of Rs. 11,00,000 deposited under protest during investigation cannot be considered as acceptance of liability. The extended period of...

  3. Failure to produce supporting documents before audit team does not constitute suppression of facts to invoke extended period of limitation u/s 73(1) of Finance Act, 1994....

  4. The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation of five years under proviso to Section 73(1) of the Finance Act could not have been invoked in the present case....

  5. Invoking the extended period of limitation u/s 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act for recovery of unpaid duty. The key points are: The department alleged suppression of...

  6. Invocation of extended period of limitation under proviso to section 73(1) of Finance Act, 1994 requires wilful suppression of facts with intent to evade service tax...

  7. Extended period of limitation - related party transaction - in two audits conducted earlier audit party did not raise any objections with regard to valuation and...

  8. Demand of service tax - Extended period of limitation - In place of invoking extended period in cases of suppression of fact with an intent to evade payment of duty or...

  9. Extended period of limitation - The very fact that the appellant is contesting the issue of invoking larger period of limitation, that the rendering of service under the...

  10. Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period of limitation was invoked....

  11. Appellant filed bill of entry correctly declaring imported goods as Composite Long Rod Insulators on 9-2-2017. Issue involved interpretation of 'composite' and 'polymer'...

  12. Extended period of limitation of five years: Mere non-disclosure of receipts in the service tax return does not automatically mean there was an intent to evade payment...

  13. CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed issues regarding the invocation of the extended period of limitation due to suppression of facts leading to denial of CENVAT...

  14. Extended period of limitation - the reason of fraud or collusion or suppression of facts, etc., “with intent to evade payment of service tax” is a necessary ingredient....

  15. Levy of penalty u/s 78 - The CESTAT held that, No evidence of positive act of suppression to evade payment of duty. Extended period cannot be invoked without evidence of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates