Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made ...

Case Laws Income Tax

September 14, 2022

Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made thereunder - revised return treated as non-est - the appellant filed his original return otherwise than u/s 139(1) or 142(1), the revised return filed u/s 139(5) of the Act became non-est in the eyes of law, consequently the claim of capital loss made by the appellant in his revised return. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made ...

Case Laws Income Tax

September 14, 2022

You may also like:

The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

Exemption u/s 11 - Admittedly, the claim of exemption was made in the revised return filed within the statutory time limit but was treated as defective only on flimsy...

Claim of expenditure in the revised return - Once, the assessee has realized that the claim was wrongly not made, the assessee has every right to revise the return...

Validity of manual revised returns filed - scheme of demerger approved - scheme of arrangement approved by NCLT required Petitioner and Hind Lamps to file revised...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an assessee can claim deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the first time in the return...

Claiming carry forward of loss at a higher level - Revised return - Since the assessee furnished the revised return within the stipulated period claiming loss at a...

Filing of revised return - denial of loss - Considering the revised return date as belated return, whereas original ITR was filed in time - the intimation under...

Validity of revised return 139(5) - Revised return did not conform to the prescription of section 139(5), before its substitution w.e.f. A.Y. 2017-18, which provided for...

Validity of revised return u/s 139(5) - return was revised after issuance of intimation u/s 143(1) - claim of benefit of excess set off of losses and carry forward of...

Filing of revised return - time limit for filing of revised return - Rule 7B of Service Tax Rules-1994 - the revenue authorities have failed to consider the aspect of...

The assessee filed an original return u/s 139(4) and later discovered an omission, wrongly claiming deduction u/s 57 for interest paid on borrowed capital under 'Income...

Non considering the revised return filed by the assessee for rectifying the mistake in claim of depreciation - In this case, the original return was not filed under...

The assessee, a works contractor, filed a return in compliance with Section 153A notice and claimed deduction u/s 80IA, which was not claimed in the original return...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Quick Updates: