Refund of Terminal Excise Duties - deemed export benefits - ...

Refund Claim Denied for Sub-Contractor Due to Lack of Appellant's Name Endorsement by Project Authority Under Foreign Trade Policy 2004-09.

September 17, 2022

Case Laws Customs HC

Refund of Terminal Excise Duties - deemed export benefits - sub-contractor - the claim of refund of Terminal Excise Duty is dependent upon the name of the Appellant being duly endorsed by the Project Authority, and that the Appellant has been unsuccessful in showing any provision under the Foreign Trade Policy 2004-09 in terms of which endorsement of certification by the main contractor was envisaged sufficient for the purpose of refund of Terminal Excise Duty - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of Terminal Excise Duties - deemed export benefits - ...

Refund Claim Denied for Sub-Contractor Due to Lack of Appellant's Name Endorsement by Project Authority Under Foreign Trade Policy 2004-09.

September 17, 2022

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Classification of services - original contract work - services provided by (sub-contractors) to the main contractor pertaining to the irrigation, construction and...

CESTAT allowed appeal concerning refund of CVD and ACD. Original authority's rejection was based on contradictory findings - accepting CA certificate showing non-passing...

Claim of Refund - Post GST, on demand, appellant paid service tax under reverse charge basis and claim refund as the same is eligible as Input Tax Credit under the...

Claim of refund of service tax paid wrongly by the sub-contractor - The sub-contractor having not contested the classification, the appellant cannot come before the...

The case involved a dispute over the classification of services provided under turnkey contracts as either Consulting Engineering Services or Works Contract Services....

SEZ Unit - sub-contract - benefit of exemption from Central Excise to the sub-contractor - If the sub-contractor has procured raw material and paid excise and raised a...

Refund of pre-deposit - refund claim filed by the CHA is proper or otherwise - It is not the case that whether CHA is claiming the refund. Those are applications of...

TDS u/s 194C was disallowed for 'Crew Wages Expenses' u/s 40(a)(ia) by the AO, considering the assessee as a sub-contractor required to deduct TDS. The assessee...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80IA(4) of the Income Tax Act for profits derived from development of an infrastructure...

Refund of SAD - The appellant, a trader, imported goods and claimed a refund on the paid Special Additional Duty (SAD). However, the refund claims were rejected by the...

Manufacturer cleared excisable goods to Mega Power Projects and SEZ units. Refund claim filed for accumulated CENVAT credit u/r 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Refund...

The case pertains to the refund of service tax paid on input services utilized for the export of 'Cut and Polished Diamonds' during October 2015 to March 2016, as per...

Payment to contractors and sub-contractors - TDS u/s 194C - vital requirement of relationship of a contractor and sub-contractor between the assessee and the...

Quick Updates: