Refund claim - export of goods - excess carried forward in the ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

December 22, 2022

Refund claim - export of goods - excess carried forward in the annual return - Rule 41(4) of the Haryana Value Added Tax Rules, 2003 - no refund was allowed as the petitioner had not claimed the same in the annual return filed in Form VAT R-2. Rather the petitioner had claimed excess carried forward in his annual return and the same was allowed. There was no occasion for Rule 42 to come into operation in such facts and circumstances. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - export of goods - excess carried forward in the ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

December 22, 2022

You may also like:

Refund claim in respect of excess paid duty - proceeding of rebate and proceeding of refund are two different proceedings - appellant have rightly claimed the refund of...

Adjustment of refund claim (rebate claim on export of goods) with demand stayed by the CESTAT

Re-import of goods - Claim of exemption from customs duty - Whether the original export was under the claim of refund of IGST? - Appellant claimed that at the time of...

Refund of Cenvat credit availed on Education Cess and Higher Secondary Education Cess carried forward as on the appointed day i.e. 30.06.2017 in terms of Section 142(3)...

Refund claim - deemed exports - The specific inclusion of clause (1A) in Rule 5 bid clearly shows the legislative intent to allow refund facility to actual physical...

Exemption u/s 11 - Accumulation of income - Carry forward of deficit - Carry forward of excess expenditure carried forward from the earlier assessment years - The...

Refund in cash - export of goods - refund of duty paid in excess through cenvat credit - voluntary excess payment of duty - re-credit allowed - no cash refund - CGOVT

Refund claim - deemed exports - assessee claims that the supplies from DTA to SEZ unit is a deemed export and as good as physical exports - refund allowed - AT

Carry forward of investment allowance - unabsorbed depreciation of Amalgamating Company - Section 72A - Claim allowed - HC

The assessee failed to claim the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) credit in the original income tax return and did not file a revised return. The Assessing Officer (AO) did...

The Punjab and Haryana High Court addressed the denial of refund of excess tax paid by contractors under the Haryana Alternative Tax Compliance Scheme for Contractors,...

Carry forward of excess payment of tax as ITC for next year - Allegation of availment of excess input tax credit - . The appellant argued that the net tax payable for...

Disallowance of setting off of the carried forward loss - return filed beyond the due date specified under subsection (1) of section 139 - It was argued that the delay...

Levy of penalty - carry forward of excess credit - it was a bona fide mistake of carrying forward excess credit - There is no other allegation or evidence brought on...

Relief to start-ups in carrying forward and setting off of losses - Relaxation in 51% holding of shares for the purpose of carry forward of losses of eligible star-up...

Quick Updates: