Validity of advance ruling - The main plank of argument of ...

High Court Rules ARA's Decision Invalid Due to Prior GST Registration Cancellation and Investigation u/s 98(2.

December 23, 2022

Case Laws GST HC

Validity of advance ruling - The main plank of argument of learned counsel for petitioner is that even by the date of filing of application before ARA on 15.12.2020, the GST has already cancelled the registration under GST Act of the petitioner - Having regard to the legal position that when investigation has already commenced prior to the filing of application, the ARA shall not admit the application as per proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 98, the ARA should not have admitted the application in the instant case and issued its ruling. Therefore, the said order dated 05.03.2020 is vitiated by law - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of advance ruling - The main plank of argument of ...

High Court Rules ARA's Decision Invalid Due to Prior GST Registration Cancellation and Investigation u/s 98(2.

December 23, 2022

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The respondent failed to process the petitioner's application for cancellation of GST registration, citing reasons such as the requirement to pay due tax and penalties,...

Retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to failure to file returns timely - impugned order does not set out any reason except referring to impugned show cause...

HC invalidated the retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to procedural deficiencies in the show cause notice (SCN). The original SCN failed to disclose the...

This is a case involving the cancellation of a petitioner's GST registration by the respondent authorities. The court held that Section 16(2)(c) and Rule 86B of the GST...

Petitioner challenged the rejection of application for revocation of cancellation of GST registration due to discrepancies in the door number of business premises....

Cancellation of GST registration of petitioner - failure to file Periodic/GST Return - The petitioner, a Goldsmith registered under the Uttarakhand Goods and Services...

The Appellate Tribunal condoned a 97-day delay in filing an appeal due to a prior writ petition. An order lacking a Document Identification Number was deemed...

HC held that cancellation of petitioner's GST registration was invalid due to procedural defects and non-application of mind. The initial SCN lacked essential details...

Cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner with retrospective effect - The High court observed that cancellation with retrospective effect should be based on...

Cancellation of GST Registration - Legal Validity of Retrospective Cancellation - The court acknowledged the lack of clarity in the show cause notice and the absence of...

Cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner with retrospective effect - The High Court held that, Records clearly demonstrate that the Petitioner had submitted an...

Cancellation of registration certificates - Non-furnishing of GST returns due to COVID - The High Court interpreted Rule 22 of the CGST Rules, 2017, particularly the...

Cancellation of GST registration of petitioner - The SCN was incapable of eliciting any meaningful response as it provided no intelligible reasons for proposing...

Retrospective cancellation of GST registration without assigning reasons violates principles of natural justice. The impugned order lacked reasoning for cancelling...

Cancellation of GST Registrations - The High Court observed that the petitioner, a wholesaler and distributor, failed to file returns for six months due to ill-health....

Quick Updates: