Warehoused goods - warehousing period expired - goods (wine) was ...

Appellant avoids full duty on expired wine but faces Rs. 1 Lakh penalty for delay u/s 117.

March 22, 2023

Case Laws Customs AT

Warehoused goods - warehousing period expired - goods (wine) was rendered unfit for human consumption - relinquishment to the title to goods - The appellant is not liable to pay duty, as till the time of relinquishment, no duty or other charges had been demanded from them. However, in the circumstances, as the appellant have also allowed the goods to deteriorate by not taking action timely to relinquish the goods within a reasonable time, they are held liable to penalty - penalty under Section 117 is imposed instead of Section 112 - reduced penalty of Rs. 1 Lakh is confirmed. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Warehoused goods - warehousing period expired - goods (wine) was ...

Appellant avoids full duty on expired wine but faces Rs. 1 Lakh penalty for delay u/s 117.

March 22, 2023

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

Levy of penalty u/s 25(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - evasion of duty - The imposition of penalty on both the appellants is un-called for - since Appellant No.1,...

Customs Cargo Service Provider (CCSP) - Suspension of their CCSP approval and imposing a penalty - Demand of value of pilfered goods - custodian of Speedy CFS -...

Penalty imposed u/s 112a(ii) of Customs Act for smuggling through mis-declaration and undervaluation. Extent of duty evasion uncertain but forensic evidence established...

Section 12(1)(b) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 requires reporting entities to furnish information about transactions referred to in Section 12(1)(a) to...

Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

Appellant imported fermented and dried processed Sumatra cocoa beans which failed to conform to IS 8865:2003 standards as per FSSAI and BIS testing. Adjudicating...

The Appellate Tribunal found the Appellant Company guilty of contravening u/s 9(1)(a) of FERA 1973 by making payments to a person outside India without RBI permission....

Penalty u/s 271B - no tax audit conducted u/s 44AB - bonafide belief - When Gross profit is more than Rs.4 crores, it means the Gross Receipts were definitely more than...

Imported material diverted to unit other than permitted unit, resulting in contravention of import-export policy provisions. Goods held liable for confiscation u/s 111...

The appellant, Container Corporation of India, was granted custodianship as a Customs Cargo Service Provider (CCSP) under the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas...

The appellate tribunal examined the penalty imposed on the company and individual for contravention of Section 6(3)(a) of FEMA and Regulations 5, 6, and 13 of the...

Levy of penalty- Fraudulent issuance of GDRs by the Company - the imposition of penalty upon the appellant after 12 years from date of resigning is excessive. In a large...

Levy of personal penalty of Rs. 10 lacs u/r 26 of CER, on appellant being DGM-Finance of the company - The appellant being worked as DGM Finance ultimately all the...

Confiscation of smuggled gold bars/biscuits u/ss 111(b), 111(d), and 111(f) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellants failed to establish the licit procurement of the...

Quick Updates: