Offence under Companies Act, 2013 - Jurisdiction - cognizance ...

Case Laws Companies Law

May 5, 2023

Offence under Companies Act, 2013 - Jurisdiction - cognizance was taken by the Special Court and summons were issued - when the enacting part of the Section is clear, its scope cannot be cut down or enlarged by resort of non-obstante clause. Thus, it could safely be held that the provisions of Section 436 of the Companies Act will have over riding effect over the provisons of Code of Criminal Procedure, whenever an offence specified under the Companies Act is to be tried by Special Court. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Offence under Companies Act, 2013 - Jurisdiction - cognizance ...

Case Laws Companies Law

May 5, 2023

You may also like:

Invocation of jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C - cognizance of offences on basis of supplementary complaint filed by the respondent against the...

Dishonor of Cheque - complaint has been lodged beyond the statutory period of limitation - the instant case learned ACJM has acted beyond his jurisdiction by issuing...

Dishonor of Cheque - recording the sworn statement - Merely in the first paragraph, the learned Magistrate has not stated cognizance was not taken and later in the last...

Evasion of custom duty - whether the Customs Act prohibits the criminal prosecution under the IPC - The investigating agency or the police would have jurisdiction to...

Validity of warrant of arrest - processes have been issued post-cognizance and it has been rightly contended on behalf of petitioners that once the summons had been...

Jurisdiction to entertain the complaint filed by the respondents - which class of Special Courts, created by Companies Act (amendment) 2017, is empowered to try the...

The Delhi High Court considered the validity of an arbitral award and the jurisdiction of the Facilitation Council u/s 18 of the MSME Act. The key issue was the...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

Jurisdiction powers to issue Reopening notice in metro city - It was established that the notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued by an Income Tax Officer (ITO),...

Change of jurisdiction u/s 127 - As in the present case, the Assessing Officer rejected the objection regarding the jurisdiction and referred the matter to the PCIT to...

Issuing summons to Daughter for the alleged offence committed by the Father - It is difficult for this Court to conclude that the petitioner had any knowledge of the...

Vicarious liability of partner of the firm - separate identity of partnership firm - merely the petitioner running a firm, but it is not a legal entity and it cannot be...

Offences u/s 276(B) and 278(B) - TDS has been deposited by the petitioners a bit late - There might be a case of slight harm in not crediting the TDS amount by...

Faceless assessment provisions u/s 151A require notice u/s 148 for income escaping assessment to be issued by Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO), not Jurisdictional...

Dishonor of Cheque - “Taking cognizance” though requires great exercise of judicial mind and is not a mechanical process but it appears in the present case that the...

Quick Updates: