Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of ...

Case Laws Central Excise

May 10, 2023

Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - Taking note of the fact that penalty imposed on the appellant is above 50% of the credit taken by the set 2 units - the penalty imposed is excessively high. Hence for justice will be met if the set penalty is reduced to 10% of the penalty imposed on the appellant - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of ...

Case Laws Central Excise

May 10, 2023

You may also like:

Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

Levy of penalty in the absence of confiscation - penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 even in case where there is no proposal for confiscation can be...

This case deals with the applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) levied u/s 147 of the Finance Act, 2002, and Additional Duty of Excise (AED) levied as...

Levy of penalty Rule 26 of Central Excise Act, 2002 - charge of abatement in the offence of fraudulent availment of cenvat credit - All the appellant having direct and...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Imposition of penalty u/r 26(2) of CER, 2002 - CENVAT Credit - Wrong availment of credit and reversal thereof on being pointed out before the issue of SCN - maximum...

Levy of penalty u/s 25(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - evasion of duty - The imposition of penalty on both the appellants is un-called for - since Appellant No.1,...

Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was Director during relevant period - Since the demand of the duty has already been settled under SVLDRS...

Levy of penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent passing of cenvat Credit - it is clearly established that the appellant has facilitated by only issuing...

Power to levy penalty for violation of CENVAT Credit Rules - Challenge to the validity of rule 13(2) of CCR 2002 and Rule 15(2) of CCR, 2004 as ultra-virus to Central...

Penatly - default in payment of duty - provisions of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - penalty under Rule 27 only can be imposed - no penalty under Rule 25...

Cenvat Credit denied on the ground that invoices did not contain necessary details as required under Rule 11 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - The fact that Rule 9(2) is...

Levy of penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - wrongful availment of CENVAT Credit - There are no whisper about any retraction or any disputes...

Quick Updates: