Refund of Customs Duty - unjust enrichment - In this case, the ...

Refund of Customs Duty Approved: Respondent Overcomes Unjust Enrichment Barrier by Retaining Imported Goods.

June 5, 2023

Case Laws Customs AT

Refund of Customs Duty - unjust enrichment - In this case, the goods brought under the impugned Bills of Entry are still in use by the respondents themselves and the Director (Operations & Technical) of the respondents, has also certified the same. In that circumstances, the respondent has passed the bar of unjust enrichment as the goods are in the possession of the respondent/importer. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of Customs Duty - unjust enrichment - In this case, the ...

Refund of Customs Duty Approved: Respondent Overcomes Unjust Enrichment Barrier by Retaining Imported Goods.

June 5, 2023

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Refund of Customs duty - unjust enrichment - Chennai Port Trust (the buyer) had indeed borne the duty burden, as evidenced by financial records and a letter from the...

Refund - when the iron ore was exported on payment of duty on FOB value, the refund of excess customs duty paid does not attract bar of unjust enrichment - refund allowed.

Refund of duty - unjust enrichment - Crying fire is of no avail if one cannot show even a streak of smoke - department failed to prove its case of unjust enrichment -...

Refund of Customs duty - principle of unjust enrichment - as per Certificate issued by the CA in favour of the respondent/Assessee to the effect that the amount of...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

Refund claim alongwith interest - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - As from the facts itself, it is clear that the appellants were not required to pay any...

Refund claim of excess duty paid - unjust enrichment - after issuance of corrigendum the excess duty, paid lacks the colour of duty and is merely a deposit - the excess...

Refund of amount paid by the petitioner during the pendency of its appeal - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - amounts deposited in terms of Section 131 of...

The case involved a refund claim for duty paid under protest, rejected on the ground of unjust enrichment. The appellant paid duty under protest and filed a refund claim...

Unjust enrichment - Section 27(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 - the question of providing unjust enrichment would not arise in the case of refund of cash securities - AT

Quick Updates: