Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2023 Year 2023 This

Validity of the notice issued u/s. 143(2) - statutory time limit ...


Assessing Officer's Notice u/s 143(2) Deemed Invalid Due to Timing Beyond Statutory Limit for 2019-20 Returns.

June 6, 2023

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Validity of the notice issued u/s. 143(2) - statutory time limit to issue notice - the AO has issued notice u/s. 143(2) on 12/10/2020 after expiry of six months from the end of the financial year (FY 2019-20) in which the return is furnished. It therefore, in our considered view, attracts the proviso to section 143(2) in which case the assessment made based on such notice becomes void ab intio. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act was issued on 15.10.2013, beyond the prescribed time limit of six months from the end of the assessment year, i.e., 30.9.2013....

  2. Validity of reopening of assessment - time limit for issue of notice u/s. 143(2) has not expired and regular assessment could have been made - the assessing officer...

  3. Validity of Notice issued u/s 143(2) - Defective return - Removal of defect beyond 15 days u/s 139(9) - AO should have treated the return as non-est when the assessee...

  4. The ITAT held that the limitation period for issuing a notice u/s 143(2) is relevant to the financial year and assessment year. When the Assessing Officer considered the...

  5. Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

  6. The case pertains to the scope of limited scrutiny by the assessing officer regarding computation of capital gains u/s 45 and providing exemption u/s 54B of the Income...

  7. Section 142(1) notice issued by non-jurisdictional officer held valid. Plain reading of Section 143(2) indicates either Assessing Officer or prescribed income-tax...

  8. The ITAT Amritsar held that the reassessment order u/s 147 was invalid due to the absence of a statutory notice u/s 143(2). The non-issuance of the statutory notice u/s...

  9. Conversion of “Limited Scrutiny” into “Complete Scrutiny” - Expanding the scope of limited scrutiny assessment without necessary approval - Since the notice under...

  10. Revision u/s 263 against non-Est order - The ITAT held that, return filed beyond the prescribed time limit under notice u/s 148 should not be treated as non-est. -...

  11. If the Assessing Officer has time in his hands to issue notice u/s 143(2), why is he issuing notice u/s 148, we do not understand, specifically in the background of the...

  12. Validity of assessment order passed u/s 143(3) - Notice issued u/s 143(2) dated 29.03.2010 is avaialable on record. - The Tribunal found that the only notice issued...

  13. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - non-issue of a notice u/s 143(2) - The Circular reinforces the position that it is sine qua non for the Assessing Officer to assume...

  14. Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - AO did not issue the notice under section 143(2) - It is the discretion of the Assessing Officer to accept the return of...

  15. Revision u/s 263 by CIT-A - Jurisdiction of AO - invalid notice u/s 143(2) - The issuance of notice u/s 143(2) is governed by statutorily prescribed procedures. On a...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates