Penalty u/s. 271(l)(c) - Voluntary disclosure of income or not - ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Imposed if Income Disclosure is Voluntary and Without Prior Detection by Tax Authorities.

June 7, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s. 271(l)(c) - Voluntary disclosure of income or not - revised return of income in which the assessee disclosed details of sale of immovable properties - It is a well-settled principle of law that if the assessee has made disclosure in the return of income, without the Department having brought the fact of omission on part of the assessee to the notice of the assessee, then it cannot be inferred that the revised return was filed pursuant to the omission having been detected by the Department. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s. 271(l)(c) - Voluntary disclosure of income or not - ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Imposed if Income Disclosure is Voluntary and Without Prior Detection by Tax Authorities.

June 7, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Voluntary surrender of income by assessee cannot be considered concealment. AO failed to prove concealment, merely concluded voluntary surrender as concealment....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Explanation is bonafide is, we find, supported by the fact that during assessment proceedings the assessee, realizing his mistake even before...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s 148 - No difference between returned income and assessed income - Assessee voluntarily...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Penalty levied u/s 271 (1) (c) - As the appellants had disclosed the income, after detection by the department and as per the terms of settlement, the assessing officer...

The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

The ITAT ruled that penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed on additional income voluntarily disclosed by the assessee during survey proceedings and...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

To impose penalty u/s 271(1)(c), willful concealment is not an essential ingredient - HC

Quick Updates: