Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowances against Credit ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 30, 2023

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowances against Credit card expense and computer expenses - considering the amount involve, the contention of the revenue authority that the assessee concealed his income by claiming deduction of impugned credit card expense and computer expenses, cannot be accepted. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowances against Credit ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 30, 2023

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance of interest expenditure under section 43B as well as disallowance export product development expenses - Just because the assessee...

Penalty u/ s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance on account of personnel expenses, operative expenses and finance expenses - it a “mere disallowance” of an expense does not warrant...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of expenses of foreign Travel expenses and inter city travel expenses - Revenue has not rejected the explanation of the...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction claimed u/s 80IA - there being no factual basis for establishing that the expenses needed to be allocated and the expenses so...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - TP Adjustment - it is a debatable issue whether reimbursement of expenses qualifies as FTS and there are various decisions which have held that...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Mere disallowance of expenses u/s 40A(3) would not invite penalty for concealing or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Assessee disclosed all particulars...

Ad-hoc disallowance at the rate of 10% on credit card expenses - Prima Facie the said disallowance is ad-hoc in nature. AO ought to have made reference to any of such...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - excess expenses disallowed and suppression of receipts - being bonafide mistake in accounting the total contract receipts, no penalty.

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Inaccurate particulars of income – Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Inaccurate particulars of income – Expenses on education of son of managing director...

Quick Updates: