Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2023 Year 2023 This

Valuation - non-inclusion of value of certain bought out items - ...


Demand Set Aside: Department Fails to Prove Bought-Out Items Were Integral to Appellants' Manufactured Equipment.

August 3, 2023

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Valuation - non-inclusion of value of certain bought out items - In the instant case, the Department could not prove conclusively that the bought-out items in dispute are integral part of the equipment manufactured; Department did not even prove that the same are fitted into the system, manufactured by the appellants, at least by the use of screwdriver technology. - Demand set aside - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

  2. Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

  3. Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

  4. Mere change of opinion cannot justify setting aside provisional assessments. Eligibility for abatement on value of bought-out items cannot be denied without findings on...

  5. Liability to pay service tax for services provided to a foreign entity. The appellant argued that their turnover within the domestic market was below the threshold...

  6. Valuation - non-inclusion of value of Bought Out items received at site - If there was any undervaluation of these items then the demand of duty should have been made on...

  7. ‘Consulting Engineering Services' - it is onus on the department to prove that the appellant has received this amount as “Consulting Engineering Firm” which the...

  8. Eligibility of CENVAT credit on various input services, write-off of obsolete items, rental charges for EOU, credit taken without documents, and the applicability of...

  9. Clandestine removal demand based on electricity consumption not sustainable as mere electricity consumption cannot be the sole basis for determining duty liability....

  10. Valuation - inclusion of value of bought out items - it is found that the bought out items have not been attached with the weigh bridge. Even after installation of the...

  11. Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

  12. Onus on Revenue to establish imported goods classifiable under Tariff Item 2710 1220 as Natural Gasoline Liquid (NGL) not discharged. Classification of goods as Naphtha...

  13. Franchisee services - The department failed to show that the appellant (the franchisor) granted representational rights to franchisee to sell or manufacture or provided...

  14. HC invalidated ex-parte assessment order and demand notices that were solely based on a previously quashed FIR. The department failed to conduct independent...

  15. The appellant manufactured polyester staple fiber (PSF) using PET bottles scrap (90%) and popcorn waste (less than 10%). The department denied the nil/concessional duty...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates