The question whether 20% or 19.72% gross profit rate should be ...

Court Rules Profit Rate Dispute as Factual, Not Legal Issue; No Legal Question for Court to Consider.

March 28, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

The question whether 20% or 19.72% gross profit rate should be applied, is the question of fact. - No question of law arises for consideration by this Court. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

The question whether 20% or 19.72% gross profit rate should be ...

Court Rules Profit Rate Dispute as Factual, Not Legal Issue; No Legal Question for Court to Consider.

March 28, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Petition maintainability hinges on alternative remedy availability. Excess tax refund due to ignorance and legal ambiguity. Supreme Court ruled that purely legal...

Refusal to rectify the assessment order passed under Rule 142 (5) of the C.G.S.T. Rules, 2017 - denial of the Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The High Court found merit in the...

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

The Supreme Court disposed of the special leave petition as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner to raise the contention regarding the validity of sanction granted by the...

HC determined the ITAT's decision to remand the matter to CIT(A) was improper when the issue was purely legal under Rule 27. Given ITAT had acknowledged the legal nature...

Money Laundering - Scheduled offences - whether the Non-Bailable Warrants (NBW) issued against the petitioner are liable to be quashed? - The High Court affirmed the...

The petitioners challenged the show cause notices (SCNs) issued by the respondent under the CGST Act, IGST Act, and MGST Act, contending that the services rendered by...

Manner of making Pre-deposit before filing an Appeal - Utilization of Input Tax credit (ITC) available in the Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) - The petitioner approached...

Estimation of profit - AO applying a profit rate of 20% on the contract receipt against the rate of profit declared by the appellant at 8.13% - CIT(A) directing the AO...

The issue raised for the first time with reference to computation of income is not a legal issue, but a pure factual issue, which were never agitated before the A.O - AT

The Madras High Court considered the issue of personal hearing notice u/s FEMA 1999. The Court held that Rule 4(3) does not require the reasoned opinion to be...

The ITAT considered the issue of set off of carried forward losses against current year profit due to a change in shareholding. Section 79 application was disputed, with...

The High Court addressed the issue of linking services provided by a company to its separate registered units for taxation purposes under CENVAT Credit Rules. The court...

Deemed divided u/s 2(22)(e) requires arriving at accumulated profits by deducting depreciation as per Income-tax Act rates. Bombay High Court in Navnit Lal C Javeri and...

The High Court reviewed a case involving a rough assessment of tax quantum and the validity of a Best judgment assessment for determining net profit in a civil work...

Quick Updates: