Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2023 Year 2023 This

Refund of excise duty paid erroneously - When the appellant ...


Refund Allowed: Revenue Wrongly Rejected Claim u/s 11B Despite Timely Filing and Self-Assessment Issues.

October 18, 2023

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Refund of excise duty paid erroneously - When the appellant realized that he has paid excess duty thereafter he filed the refund application under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. Refund was rejected mainly on the ground that he has not challenged the self-assessment in appeal and without challenging the self-assessment refund claim is not maintainable. It is also not in dispute that the refund claim has been filed within the period of limitation as prescribed under the provision of Section 11B. - Revenue wrongly rejected the claim - refund allowed - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The petitioner's application for GST refund, filed on 08.09.2020, was within the two-year limitation period prescribed u/s 54 of the CGST Act, 2017. The respondents...

  2. The appellants claimed that the entire amount of service tax paid by them should be considered as a deposit u/s 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and sought a refund....

  3. Refund claim for service tax paid under reverse charge mechanism on transportation of raw material was rejected. The appellant had self-assessed and filed returns...

  4. Service tax refund claim filed beyond statutory limitation period cannot be entertained. Refund application must be filed within one year from relevant date as per...

  5. The case involved a dispute over a refund claim u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the time limitation for filing the refund claim did...

  6. Time limitation for filing refund claim is one year from relevant date as per Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 made applicable to service tax under Finance Act,...

  7. Refund of excess tax paid - The refund claim under 11B was rejected by the Original Authority on the ground that the claim cannot be modified by the appellant to include...

  8. Refund claim - The decision of ITC Limited is not applicable to the present facts and circumstances of the case as at the time of filing of Bills of Entry, the appellant...

  9. The CESTAT dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant seeking refund of central excise duty u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant's claim for refund on...

  10. CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that refund claim for service tax under section 65 of Finance Act, 1994 was not time-barred as the relevant date for refund claim was the date of...

  11. Refund claim for service tax paid on ocean freight not barred by time limitation. Section 11B(5)(B)(ec) of Central Excise Act, 1994 made applicable to Finance Act, 1994...

  12. Refund claim - time limitation - Service tax was paid on advance received - later the order was cancelled - The relevant date for filing the refund claim is the...

  13. Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

  14. Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

  15. Re-import of goods - Claim of exemption from customs duty - Whether the original export was under the claim of refund of IGST? - Appellant claimed that at the time of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates