Levy of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act 1962 - Customs ...

Customs House Agent's Penalty u/s 112(a) Overturned Due to Lack of Evidence on Importer Verification Breach.

October 18, 2023

Case Laws Customs AT

Levy of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act 1962 - Customs House Agent (CHA) - violation of Regulation 13 of CHALR 2004 - It is alleged that the appellant did not verify the antecedents of the importer - The department has not been able to establish sufficient grounds for imposing penalty under section 112 (a) of Customs Act 1962. The penalty imposed is not warranted and not justified. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act 1962 - Customs ...

Customs House Agent's Penalty u/s 112(a) Overturned Due to Lack of Evidence on Importer Verification Breach.

October 18, 2023

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

Penalty levied u/s 112(b) of Customs Act challenged due to lack of proper evidence. Appellant obtained PNR movement documents from steamer agent for cargo movement from...

Appellant, a Customs House Agent (CHA), was exonerated from penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act. CESTAT held no evidence of appellant's abetment in misdeclaration of...

The key points are: misdeclaration of goods by the importer cannot render the Customs House Agent (CHA) vicariously liable for penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962....

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on an employee of the Customs Broker - classification of imported goods - The commissioner has recorded as finding...

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

The case involved a penalty u/s 112(B) of the Customs Act, 1962 against an employee of a Customs House Agent (CHA) for allegedly concealing information affecting a bill...

CESTAT ruled in favor of delivery agents, setting aside penalties u/ss 112(a) and 114AA of Customs Act, 1962. The agents, who handled a sealed FCL container from Jebel...

CESTAT set aside penalties imposed under s.112(a) and s.112(b) of Customs Act 1962 against appellant for alleged gold smuggling. Court found insufficient evidence beyond...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act - Penalty on CEO for abetment - Meaning of word abetment is "to help someone in wrong doing" - In the instant case such...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) and 114A of CA - Evasion of Customs Duty - Forging of signature - high seas sale - allegation is that appellant had prior knowledge about the...

Imposition of penalty u/s 112 (d) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - appellant was only a Customs Broker and not the importer - the only allegation...

Undervaluation of imported goods - Patchouli Oil - The CESTAT found that the rejection of the declared value lacked legal basis and was unsupported by evidence. The...

Customs authority rejected transaction value declared by importer and enhanced value based on email evidence and statement of partner admitting negotiated higher price....

Customs broker's license revoked, entire security deposit forfeited, penalty levied for contravening Regulations 10(a), 10(b), 10(d), 10(e), 10(f), 10(k) & 10(n) of...

Quick Updates: