Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2024 Year 2024 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - failing to ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

January 16, 2024

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - failing to tick mark the limb or non-striking of second limb - The Court observed that such violation will not result in nullifying the orders passed by statutory authorities. It was observed that if the case of the assessee is that the assessee was put to a prejudice and principles of natural justice were violated on account of not being able to submit an effective reply, it would be a different matter. It was observed that on facts, the Court could safely conclude that even assuming that there was defect in the notice, it had caused no prejudice to the assessee and the assessee “clearly understood” what was the purport and import of notice issued under section 274 read with Section 271 of the Act. The principles of natural justice cannot be read in abstract. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - The notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(l)(c) of the Act were issued without striking off the irrelevant portion of the limb...

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non specification of clear charge - undisclosed unsold inventory - Notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) of the Act was issued without striking off...

  3. Penalty order u/s 271(1)(c) - validity of notice issued u/s 274 - non-striking off of ‘inaccurate particular’ or marking on ‘concealment of income’ portion - mere not...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Non specification of charge - defective notice - as the A.O had clearly failed to discharge his statutory obligation of fairly putting the...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - validity of notice u/s 274 - Quite clearly, non-striking-off of the irrelevant limb in the said notice does not convey to the assessee as to...

  6. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - non specification of charge - Assessing Officer has issued a vague and defective notice under section 274 r.w.s....

  7. Levy fo Penalty - AO failed to strike off either of the limbs of section 271(1)(c), which are not satisfied by the assessee and consequently, notice issued under section...

  8. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - As a matter of fact the notice issued u/s 274 read with section 271 of the Act itself was ambiguous as it did not make it clear as to under which...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Mandation of specification of charge - It is clear that for the AO to assume jurisdiction u/s 271(1)(c), proper notice is necessary and the...

  11. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - validity of notice issued u/s 274 - mere failure to tick mark the applicable grounds - These proceedings culminate under a different...

  12. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice u/s 274 - The notice does not delete the appropriate words and in the assessment order as well as in the penalty order, both...

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defect in the SCN - AO has issued a generic show cause notice in a printed form without mentioning the specific charge by striking off the...

  14. Penalty proceedings initiated u/s 271(1)(c) is void ab initio and liable to be quashed as the AO has issued vague notice u/s 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) without striking off of...

  15. The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates