Levy of Redemption Fine and penalty - Confiscation of imported ...

Confiscated Goods Misdeclared on Import; Penalty and Fine Upheld at Rs. 4.5 Lakh for Goods Valued at Rs. 22.9 Lakh.

January 18, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

Levy of Redemption Fine and penalty - Confiscation of imported goods - The goods imported were restricted goods and could have been imported on the basis of the Licence issued by the DGFT and being misdeclared in respect of description, weight and value were liable for confiscation and penalty under Section 112(a) of the Act for his act of omissions and commissions. The redemption fine imposed on the appellant of Rs.4,50,000/- is commensurate with the assessable value of the goods of ₹22, 90, 920/ and hence requires no interference. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of Redemption Fine and penalty - Confiscation of imported ...

Confiscated Goods Misdeclared on Import; Penalty and Fine Upheld at Rs. 4.5 Lakh for Goods Valued at Rs. 22.9 Lakh.

January 18, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

Imported material diverted to unit other than permitted unit, resulting in contravention of import-export policy provisions. Goods held liable for confiscation u/s 111...

Appellant imported fermented and dried processed Sumatra cocoa beans which failed to conform to IS 8865:2003 standards as per FSSAI and BIS testing. Adjudicating...

Confiscation - fine - penalty - Mis-declaring the quantity of cigarettes imported under warehouse bill of entry for re-export purpose - The customs authorities...

The case pertains to the imposition of a fine and penalty for the rejection of the declared value and redetermination of the value u/r 12 of the Customs Valuation...

The CESTAT held that the imported betel nuts were rightly classified under CTH 0802 8030. While the minimum import price fixed by DGFT could not be treated as tariff...

Penalty imposed for import of chemicals using fake duty exemption licenses. Appellant claimed exemption under DEPB but used fake licenses and TRAs. Statement of witness...

Confiscation of imported used tyres - imposition of redemption fine and penalty - Considering the fact that the goods are not prohibited to import, the redemption fine...

Valuation of imported goods - on the basis of wrong documents submitted by the overseas entity, the appellant had filed the Bills of Entry, the lenient approach can be...

Release of goods - insecticides, pesticides and other agrochemicals including technical such as “Cyantraniliprole Technical” - Import through Port which is not a...

Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

The NFRA held that the Auditors were grossly negligent and failed to exercise due diligence in the audit of a public interest entity, amounting to professional...

Penalty imposed u/s 112a(ii) of Customs Act for smuggling through mis-declaration and undervaluation. Extent of duty evasion uncertain but forensic evidence established...

The CESTAT upheld the duty demand, confiscation of imported goods for non-fulfilment of export obligation u/s 111(o), imposition of redemption fine u/s 125, and...

The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine and penalty for importing old clothing. Referring to a previous case, it upheld confiscation due to non-compliance but decreased...

Quick Updates: