CIRP - Home Buyers - Moratorium against the company has been ...

Moratorium Under IBC Doesn't Shield Directors or Officers; Supreme Court Overturns Previous Ruling.

February 1, 2024

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy SC

CIRP - Home Buyers - Moratorium against the company has been ordered - The Supreme Court's decision in this case clarifies that the moratorium u/s 14 of IBC does not extend to the directors or officers of a company under moratorium. The Court set aside the National Commission's orders, which had held that a decree cannot be executed against a company due to the moratorium u/s 14 of the IBC and, consequently, against certain individuals. The Court remitted the execution application to the National Commission, allowing proceedings against the individual respondents (directors/ officers) for execution, subject to their liability to comply with the order passed against the company.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CIRP - Home Buyers - Moratorium against the company has been ...

Moratorium Under IBC Doesn't Shield Directors or Officers; Supreme Court Overturns Previous Ruling.

February 1, 2024

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy SC

You may also like:

Dishonor of Cheque - ongoing moratorium period as contemplated u/s 14 of the IBC - The moratorium provision not extending to persons other than the corporate debtor. In...

HC determined that moratorium period under IBC Section 14 must be excluded when calculating limitation period for restoration applications under CPC Order IX Rule 9....

The NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the NCLT order, ruling that u/s 14 of the IBC, 2016, a security deposit lying with a third party cannot be adjusted against...

Interim-moratorium u/s 96 IBC applies to proceedings against petitioner u/s 138 NI Act. HC set aside revisional court order, allowed petition directing stay on Section...

CIRP in progress - moratorium in effect - recovery of dues from NPA - It is claimed that since the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC has ceased to subsist after the...

From perusal of Section 96(1)(b) of IBC, 2016, interim moratorium restrains ongoing or fresh legal action or proceeding regarding debt pertaining to personal guarantor,...

The High Court ruled that security interests over assets of a corporate debtor to secure amounts due under a judgment or decree must give way to the provisions of the...

The SC held that penalties imposed by the NCDRC are regulatory in nature and do not constitute "debt" under the IBC. The moratorium under Section 96 of IBC does not...

The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

Penalty on directors - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules - Rule 26 is prima facie in excess of the Rule making power conferred under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HC

CIRP - Partnership Form - The court examined the definitions under the IBC and noted that it does not include partnership firms or their directors as corporate debtors....

Maintainability of advance ruling application questioned due to pending classification issue before Customs Officer for 13 imported products used in Lithium-ion cell...

Dishonour of Cheque - Liability of Director of company - Company is under CIRP proceedings under IBC and Director is personal guarantor to the loan - the provisions of...

NCLAT determined that the moratorium period of 180 days u/s 101(1) of IBC is mandatory, not directory, and cannot be extended by either the Adjudicating Authority or the...

Vicarious liability of Additional Director - Non-executive Independent Directors or not - Officer in default - non repayment of deposits by the Company to the depositors...

Quick Updates: