Penalty levied u/s 272(1)(d) - non-compliance of notice issued ...

Tribunal Annuls Rs. 30,000 Penalty for Non-Compliance, Accepts Internal Issues as Reasonable Cause.

February 9, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty levied u/s 272(1)(d) - non-compliance of notice issued u/s 142(1) - internal problems in the organization - Tribunal found the appellant's explanation acceptable under section 273B, which allows for a reasonable cause for non-compliance. Consequently, the penalty of Rs. 30,000 was annulled.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty levied u/s 272(1)(d) - non-compliance of notice issued ...

Tribunal Annuls Rs. 30,000 Penalty for Non-Compliance, Accepts Internal Issues as Reasonable Cause.

February 9, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

CESTAT upheld reclassification of imported high conductivity copper bus bars from CTI 7407 21 20 to CTI 7407 10 30, resulting in denial of FTA benefits under N/N....

The case pertains to the imposition of a fine and penalty for the rejection of the declared value and redetermination of the value u/r 12 of the Customs Valuation...

Appellant failed to submit required documents within stipulated time for provisional duty assessment, contravening Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations,...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

Applicability of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) provisions to a non-resident bank and its CEO. The bank was charged with contravening sections 64(2), 6(4),...

ITAT modified multiple additions in a tax appeal concerning bogus purchases and unexplained money. For contested purchases of Rs. 13,80,63,994, ITAT directed application...

Penalty for violation of Section 15HB of SEBI Act, 1992 - justification for the Tribunal to reduce the penalty below Rs. 1,00,000/- which is the minimum as permissible -...

The Appellate Tribunal found the Appellant Company guilty of contravening u/s 9(1)(a) of FERA 1973 by making payments to a person outside India without RBI permission....

The ITAT quashed penalty proceedings under section 271D imposed on the assessee for accepting cash loans of Rs. 61,50,000/- in violation of section 269SS. The Tribunal...

Reduction of issued, subscribed, and paid-up equity share capital u/s 66 of the Companies Act, 2013. Compliance with Sections 66(1), 66(2), and 66(3) satisfied....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

The High Court considered a case involving the release of seized goods u/s 110A. The issue was the non-issuance of a show cause notice within the stipulated time due to...

The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

SC upheld the Tribunal's compensation award in a motor accident death claim, restoring Rs. 58,24,000/- for father and Rs. 93,61,000/- for mother against claimed amounts...

Quick Updates: