Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2024 Year 2024 This

Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposit during the ...


Tribunal Rejects Revision of Tax Assessment Due to Lack of New Evidence in Demonetization Cash Deposit Case.

February 21, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposit during the demonization period - The tribunal noted that the AO had conducted an adequate inquiry into the assessee's cash deposits, purchases, and sales, and had accepted the return of income after verification. It was found that the PCIT's order u/s 263 was based on re-evaluation of the same material already considered by the AO without any new evidence or inquiry that justified a revision u/s 263. - The ITAT concluded that the AO's order was not erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the revenue.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The appellant could not establish the source for cash deposits during demonetization. The Appellate Tribunal held that sales cannot be rejected solely based on higher...

  2. Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

  3. The ITAT Visakhapatnam addressed an addition u/s 69A for unexplained cash deposits in the bank account. The assessee failed to explain the sources for cash deposits,...

  4. Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposits - onus to prove - The Pr. CIT found the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue's interests due to...

  5. The ITAT Delhi considered an addition u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE for cash deposited during demonetization as unexplained. The assessee's explanation of cash deposits from...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of addition u/s 69A with reference to cash deposits during demonetization. The assessee failed to establish the source of...

  7. The assessee's unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were deleted by the CIT(A) after accepting the submissions that the cash receipts from various sources like cash sales,...

  8. The High Court rejected the appeal filed by the applicant due to lack of reasons for enhancing turnover, non-consideration of material evidence, and failure to obtain...

  9. Cash deposits made during demonetization period from cash withdrawals and rental income received in cash were substantiated through cash flow statements and bank...

  10. The assessee, a septuagenarian gynecologist with no business income during the year, made cash deposits totaling Rs. 10 lakh in her bank account during demonetization....

  11. Cash deposit during demonetization period treated as unexplained cash credit. Assessee's claim of introducing cash as capital in proprietary concern not accepted due to...

  12. The case involved the scope of limited scrutiny and the validity of a notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny to...

  13. Addition u/s 69A - Addition of cash deposits made by the assessee during the demonetization period - The Tribunal examined the legality of the assessment order, the...

  14. Addition on account of cash deposit during demonetization period - the assessee glumly failed to justify the genuineness of the cash on hand viz a viz its use for...

  15. In the case at hand, the workmen's claims for wages and other dues were rejected by the liquidator due to lack of evidence substantiating their employment on the date of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates