Denial the benefit of the exemption notification no. 45/2017-Cus ...

Appellant Can Reclaim Benefits Under Alternative Notification for Re-Imported Goods Rejected by Thailand.

February 29, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

Denial the benefit of the exemption notification no. 45/2017-Cus and 46/2017-Cus - Re-importation of the goods - The appellant exported goods to Thailand but faced rejection due to quality issues - switch over to the benefit of another Notification No. 158/95-Cus - The Tribunal directed the matter to be reconsidered, allowing the possibility of applying alternative beneficial notifications if applicable. While acknowledging the breach of Notification 158/95-Cus and the consequent liability for duties and penalties, the CESTAT emphasized that if another beneficial notification was available and applicable to the appellant, they could legitimately claim its benefits.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Denial the benefit of the exemption notification no. 45/2017-Cus ...

Appellant Can Reclaim Benefits Under Alternative Notification for Re-Imported Goods Rejected by Thailand.

February 29, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Notification 52/2003-Cus dated 31.03.2003 governs the re-import of goods after export. Sr. No. 14 allows re-import for repair/reconditioning within 3/7 years,...

The appellant had initially exported Indian tea to Netherlands, which was rejected and recalled to India. Upon re-importation, no DEPB claim was advanced. The goods were...

CESTAT Bangalore held that goods of foreign origin imported for repairs and return are eligible for exemption under the Notification No.153/1994. The appellant imported...

Misuse of Advance Authorisation for export of garments - Diversion of imported goods into open market without using the same in export goods - The Tribunal upheld the...

Eligibility for exemption notification - If the exemption notification is read as per the appellant‟s submissions, it will put the domestic industry at a...

Mis-declaration of goods - import of PLC Splitter Module - Merely because the appellant sought for duty exemption on the belief that the goods imported by him fall...

The case pertains to the valuation of imported porcelain vitrified tiles. The key points are: The assessment attained finality, but the appellant has the legal right to...

CESTAT held that appellant was entitled to benefit under N/N. 94/96-Cus for imported goods that were initially exported and returned. While the adjudicating authority...

The appellants imported 251.300 MTs of re-rollable scrap on a high sea sales basis and classified it under CTH 7214 1090 as re-rollable scrap. However, the Department...

The case involves a dispute over whether imported goods qualify as 'Capital Goods' for exemption under a customs notification. The Revenue alleged that the imports did...

Classification of import of UPS - Benefit of exemption - The department observed that the imported Home UPS were actually household inverters used for running home...

The CESTAT allowed the appeals filed by the appellant. The Tribunal held that the appellant is eligible for the benefit of the SAFTA Notification No. 99/2011-Customs...

Import of Internal Remote Electrical Tilt Switches (iRET) - benefit of Exemption notification - Whether the amperage of the iRETs imported by the appellant were of 5...

Benefit of exemption from customs duty - Change of Notification in the bill of entry - alternate exemption Notification - The Tribunal held that, the only criteria to be...

Valuation of imported goods - The only ground on the basis of which the transaction value has been rejected is that the imports were made at a higher price by other...

Quick Updates: