Demand duty - Imported one consignment of ‘Bed sheet’, declared ...

Case Laws Customs

March 6, 2024

Demand duty - Imported one consignment of ‘Bed sheet’, declared as made of “100% Polyester” - mis-declaration the goods - The Tribunal observed that, the articles which have been imported by the respondent are woven fabric of synthetic filament yarn, but they are Bed spreads / Bed sheets and quantity of the goods in numbers has been described by the respondent. - The Tribunal held that the respondent's classification of the goods under CTH 6304 was correct, and they are not liable for confiscation. Additionally, it was determined that no penalty is imposable on the respondent, and no redemption fine is payable.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Demand duty - Imported one consignment of ‘Bed sheet’, declared ...

Case Laws Customs

March 6, 2024

You may also like:

The case involves classification of imported goods, specifically bed sheets declared as made of 100% polyester. The revenue authority classified the consignment as...

Classification of Goods - Imported one consignment of ‘Bed sheet’, declared as Polyester Bed sheet - The Tribunal noted that although the goods were made of synthetic...

Mandatory penalty u/s 114A of the Customs Act, 1962 not imposed - imported goods as “Polyester Bed Sheet”- mis-classified the impugned goods - The case involves a...

Bed sheets imported were correctly classified under CTH 6304 as bed spreads/bed sheets, despite being made of 100% polyester yarn. Although woven fabric of synthetic...

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled on the classification of imported bed sheets declared as made of 100% polyester. The key points...

100% EOU - demand of customs duty on the raw material imported duty free - removal of finished goods in DTA without having any permission from the Development...

Mis-declaration the consignment imported - demand of duty of past consignments (import) with the live consignment - since the assessment was not provisional and not...

The case involved the classification of imported consignments u/s CTH 5903 or CTH 5407. CESTAT held that goods were not classifiable u/s CTH 54071094. No...

Duty demand - collection excess duty from customers on sale of import goods - duty under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act cannot be demanded on imported custom...

100% EOU - mis-declaration - the appellant has violate the faith imposed in them in as much as they did not even bother to check whether the job worker declared by them...

Nature of Duty Paid by 100% Export Oriented Units (EOU) - The CESTAT held that while the measure adopted for computing duty paid by 100% EOUs may be based on customs...

In the case before CESTAT Bangalore, the issue revolved around mis-declaration of import value, duty demand, confiscation of goods, and penalty imposition. The...

100% EOU - demand of duty - grey fabrics manufactured cleared to DTA units - appellant obtained raw materials duty free i.e. without payment of duty removed...

Import of Toys - Import policy - Wither the goods are excluded under the scope of BIS, the testing of the same could be made mandatory - the testing procedures have to...

Mis-declaration of goods - import of PLC Splitter Module - Merely because the appellant sought for duty exemption on the belief that the goods imported by him fall...

Quick Updates: