Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2024 Year 2024 This

Unexplained creditor u/s. 68 - onus to prove - The ITAT ruled ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

March 6, 2024

Unexplained creditor u/s. 68 - onus to prove - The ITAT ruled that once the identity of the creditor and the genuineness of the transaction are established, proving the creditor's capacity is not mandatory for the assessee. This is supported by the precedent set in "Labh Chand Bohra Vs. ITO" by the Rajasthan High Court, aligning with the doctrine that the onus shifts away from the assessee once the initial proof of transaction is provided.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. In a case concerning unexplained credit u/s 68, the assessee proved the identity and genuineness of share applicants, although their creditworthiness was questioned. The...

  2. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credits - Onus to prove - CIT(A) deleted addition - The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to discharge its onus of proving the...

  3. Addition u/s. 68 being unsecured loans - onus to prove - The ITAT held that, primary onus can be discharged by establishing/furnishing the proof of the identity of the...

  4. Addition u/s 68 - unsecured loan - unexplained cash credit - the assessee has discharged the primary onus by proving the identity of the creditor, genuineness of the...

  5. Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained cash credit - It is well settled principle that the repayment of cash credit would not prove the genuineness of cash credit. It is the...

  6. Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained cash creditors - once it is established that it is the creditors' money that has found its way in the books of the assessee, no adverse...

  7. Non-proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share premium received cannot be treated as unexplained income if sufficient documentary evidence is provided....

  8. Addition u/s 68 - genuineness of transactions - Authorities below have not further discharged the onus shifted onto their shoulders to bring on record any positive...

  9. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share capital receipts - Onus to prove -Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share capital receipts - Onus to prove - SC dismissed the SLP against...

  10. Unexplained Cash deposited into Bank Accounts - income from unexplained source u/s 69B - Onus to prove - Onus cast on the Appellant has not been discharged.addition u/s...

  11. Unexplained unsecured loan - the necessary papers to establish genuineness of the transaction were filed and the assessee had proved beyond doubt the identity of the...

  12. Addition u/s 68 - onus to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the share applicants - Both the nature & source of the share application received was...

  13. The assessee successfully discharged the onus u/s 68 regarding share capital introduced by the company director, a major shareholder, proving identity, creditworthiness,...

  14. Unexplained share capital and premium received by assessee company was its own unaccounted money flowing back in form of premium on share allotment. Assessee filed...

  15. Addition of unsecured loan u/s 68 - interest free unsecured loan received from a close friend in Dubai to fund ongoing project with a condition that amount will be...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates