Maintainability of curative petition - restoration of arbitral ...

Case Laws Indian Laws

April 16, 2024

Maintainability of curative petition - restoration of arbitral award which had been set aside by the Division Bench of the High court on the ground that it suffered from patently illegality. - The Supreme Court found that invoking curative jurisdiction was justified to prevent a miscarriage of justice. It highlighted the circumstances under which curative petitions could be entertained, emphasizing cases where there is a gross miscarriage of justice or abuse of process. The Court reiterated that interference with arbitral awards should be minimal and only on grounds of patent illegality or perversity. It emphasized that an arbitral tribunal's decision should not be disturbed unless it is evident that a reasonable person could not have arrived at such a decision based on the evidence presented.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Maintainability of curative petition - restoration of arbitral ...

Case Laws Indian Laws

April 16, 2024

You may also like:

The Appellate Court exceeded its jurisdiction u/s 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by setting aside an arbitral award that had already been confirmed...

Arbitral award does not conflict with public policy of India or vitiate by patent illegality. Gita Power justifiably subjected to arbitration and jointly liable with OPG....

Scope of arbitral award - The principle of interpretation of contracts adopted by the Division Bench of the High Court that when two constructions are possible, then...

Arbitrator's award set aside u/s 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to lack of evidence regarding claimant's readiness to supply materials, arbitrator...

Rejection of application for condonation of delay in preferring the application u/s 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act - No application for setting aside the...

Criminal proceedings involving allegations of fraudulent activities in an IPO were challenged. The validity hinged on whether a Single Judge or Division Bench should...

Validity of Arbitral Award - In the remand back case, the Arbitrator was warned not to be influenced by the factors that weighed in his mind while making the First Award....

Grant of Interim Award - There was a fundamental failure of the first Arbitral Tribunal to address the plea raised by ONGC for attracting the group of companies doctrine....

Scope of arbitration award - Once it was found that the advance amount was paid for hypothecation of equipment and thereafter when the Arbitral Tribunal awarded the...

Arbitral Tribunal's award of tax component upheld despite contract being inclusive of tax. Award can be set aside u/s 34(2-A) only where illegality goes to root of...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Tribunal clarified that its order dated 26.05.2022 did not modify or vary the earlier orders dated 15.10.2018 and 11.01.2019, except for directing sealed cover...

Validity of award of interest by the sole arbitrator - earnest money and security deposits or not - The learned Arbitrator in the instant case has erred in awarding...

Arbitral award - The scope of interference with the Arbitral Award under Section 34 of the Act is limited. The impugned award can be interfered only on the grounds as...

Execution of the award passed by the learned Arbitral Tribunal/Court - If the High Courts convert itself to the Executing Court and entertain the writ petitions under...

Quick Updates: