Maintainability of curative petition - restoration of arbitral ...

Curative Petition Restores Arbitral Award: Supreme Court Invokes Jurisdiction to Prevent Gross Injustice.

April 16, 2024

Case Laws Indian Laws SC

Maintainability of curative petition - restoration of arbitral award which had been set aside by the Division Bench of the High court on the ground that it suffered from patently illegality. - The Supreme Court found that invoking curative jurisdiction was justified to prevent a miscarriage of justice. It highlighted the circumstances under which curative petitions could be entertained, emphasizing cases where there is a gross miscarriage of justice or abuse of process. The Court reiterated that interference with arbitral awards should be minimal and only on grounds of patent illegality or perversity. It emphasized that an arbitral tribunal's decision should not be disturbed unless it is evident that a reasonable person could not have arrived at such a decision based on the evidence presented.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Maintainability of curative petition - restoration of arbitral ...

Curative Petition Restores Arbitral Award: Supreme Court Invokes Jurisdiction to Prevent Gross Injustice.

April 16, 2024

Case Laws Indian Laws SC

You may also like:

SC overturned Division Bench's interference with arbitral award concerning contract interpretation between NHAI and contractor regarding geogrid quantities. Court held...

Scope of arbitral award - The principle of interpretation of contracts adopted by the Division Bench of the High Court that when two constructions are possible, then...

The Appellate Court exceeded its jurisdiction u/s 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by setting aside an arbitral award that had already been confirmed...

Tribunal clarified that its order dated 26.05.2022 did not modify or vary the earlier orders dated 15.10.2018 and 11.01.2019, except for directing sealed cover...

Execution of the award passed by the learned Arbitral Tribunal/Court - If the High Courts convert itself to the Executing Court and entertain the writ petitions under...

Arbitrator's award set aside u/s 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to lack of evidence regarding claimant's readiness to supply materials, arbitrator...

Execution of arbitral award - the arbitral proceedings were initiated prior to insolvency resolution date, suspended during the moratorium period, resumed upon expiry of...

Grant of Arbitral Award - when a Court is applying the ‘public policy’ test to an arbitral award, it does not act as a court of appeal and consequently errors of fact...

The SC held that u/s 31(7) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the 'sum' awarded by the arbitral tribunal, whether inclusive of interest or not from the date...

The Delhi High Court considered the validity of an arbitral award and the jurisdiction of the Facilitation Council u/s 18 of the MSME Act. The key issue was the...

Validity of Arbitral Award - In the remand back case, the Arbitrator was warned not to be influenced by the factors that weighed in his mind while making the First Award....

Grant of Interim Award - There was a fundamental failure of the first Arbitral Tribunal to address the plea raised by ONGC for attracting the group of companies doctrine....

Validity of Arbitral Award - Ordering the petitioner to repay advances for rejected testing kits with interest and legal costs - The court observed that the arbitrator...

Arbitral award - The scope of interference with the Arbitral Award under Section 34 of the Act is limited. The impugned award can be interfered only on the grounds as...

International Arbitral award - The Arbitral Tribunal has only awarded reimbursement of half the price paid by the buyers to the sellers and, therefore, the award cannot...

Quick Updates: