Release of seized goods - The appellants argued that the seized ...

Court Denies Return of Seized Goods Despite Lapse in Notice Period, Citing Appellants' Conduct and Circumstances.

April 22, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Release of seized goods - The appellants argued that the seized goods should be returned as no notice was issued within six months of seizure, as stipulated by Section 67(7) of the Act. - The High Court observed that the time for issuance of notice can be extended for a further period not exceeding six months on sufficient cause being shown by the proper officer. - The court acknowledged previous representations made for the release of seized stock, indicating that the matter had been raised prior to the expiry of the statutory period. - It stated that considering the conduct of the appellants and the circumstances, they were not entitled to any relief, implying that failure to approach for release was not the determining factor in the decision.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Release of seized goods - The appellants argued that the seized ...

Court Denies Return of Seized Goods Despite Lapse in Notice Period, Citing Appellants' Conduct and Circumstances.

April 22, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Customs officials seized gold jewelry from petitioners on 23-02-2023. Section 110(2) of Customs Act, 1962 mandates issuing show cause notice u/s 124 within six months of...

Seeking release of seized gold - no show cause notice for seizure of the said gold chain - The High court observed that there is no provision in the Customs Act...

Period of limitation for retaining the seized goods - Seeking return of his laptop, computer, documents and other things which were seized during search proceedings -...

Validity of order of lower court for release of goods / return of goods to the accused - Smuggling - yellow coloured metallic bars believed to be gold of Foreign origin...

Rejection of request for provisional release of the seized goods - high end wrist watches - prohibited goods or not - In the present case, the appellant had not only...

Validity of confiscation proceedings - Rejection of value of importer - imported goods auctioned without prior notice to the appellant - It is a settled law that once...

Confiscation of Goods – Service of notice – Lapse of period – date of sending or dispatching notice by registered post is date of giving notice as contemplated under...

Reopening of assessment without releasing seized documents by Crime branch - Petitioner seeking the release of seized documents and items to effectively respond to...

Seizure of gold and a vehicle by police authorities from the appellant and others. The police handed over the seized goods to customs authorities. The appellant is the...

The case involved a petitioner seeking relief under Article 227 of the Constitution regarding the rejection of their application for condonation of delay in claiming a...

Lapsed SCN - Period of Limitation - The intention of the legislation, thus, is apparent that the show cause notices which were issued prior to the Finance Act coming...

The appellants challenged the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) denying eligible interest on the refunded amount. The court held that interest accrued on the deposited...

Invocation of extended period of limitation. - The Appellant had been providing same services as was alleged in the earlier Show Cause Notice dated 22.05.2015 which was...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

Challenge to provisional attachment order concerning bank account - pre-show cause notice issued - court held documents seized should be returned as petitioner is in...

Quick Updates: