Imposition of Penalties u/s 112(a) & (b) and 114AA - Each ...

Case Laws Customs

May 2, 2024

Imposition of Penalties u/s 112(a) & (b) and 114AA - Each appellant denied direct involvement or knowledge of the illegal activities, claiming to have played different roles in the importation process. - import of restricted / prohibited goods - The Tribunal carefully evaluated the submissions and evidence presented by both parties. It found that penalties were justified for appellants extensively involved in the importation process, including procurement, concealment, transportation, and distribution of goods. However, penalties were set aside for appellants with limited or no direct involvement in the illegal activities.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of Penalties u/s 112(a) & (b) and 114AA - Each ...

Case Laws Customs

May 2, 2024

You may also like:

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

Imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) - employees of CHA - violation of import conditions - Goods diverted with his knowledge - The imposition of penalty on the Appellant,...

Imposition of penalty - section 112(b) of Customs Act - smuggling - diamonds - The active role of these Appellant, do not justify imposition of heavy penalty under...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act 1962 - smuggling of Gold activity - reliability of statements - The appellant cannot come within the ambit of Section...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on an employee of the Customs Broker - classification of imported goods - The commissioner has recorded as finding...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on a co-noticee who is a Partner in a Customs Broker firm for...

Levy of penalty - Generalia specialibus non derogant - levy of special penalty over general penalty - the Commissioner perfectly justified in imposing penalty under...

Levy of penalty - smuggling of Gold - baggage rules - The case involved the petitioner's challenge against the imposition of a penalty under Sections 112(a) and 112(b)...

Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

Smuggling of gold - Imposition of penalties u/s 112 - The appellants were intercepted along with their luggage, which was found to contain smuggled gold bars. However,...

Smuggling of Cigarettes - whether CHA is liable for penalty u/s 112(a) - When there is no evidence to establish that the appellant had prior knowledge of the illegal...

Importation of an old and used car by misdeclaring it as new, resulting in undervaluation. Imposition of composite penalty u/ss 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of the Customs...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 & 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abating the importer - In present import, there is no evidence to allege that appellants were...

Levy of penalty - allegation for abatement in smuggling of Gold - the activity of facilitating the financing of fund has been turned by the Ld. Commissioner into...

Quick Updates: