Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2024 Year 2024 This

Deduction u/s.80IA(4)(i) - assessee business is in the nature of ...


Tribunal Remands Case for Reevaluation of Assessee's Status as Developer or Contractor for Tax Deductions.

May 4, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Deduction u/s.80IA(4)(i) - assessee business is in the nature of work contract - The Tribunal engaged in a thorough analysis to determine whether the assessee acted as a contractor or a developer. It highlighted the legal and functional distinctions between the two, noting that developers are involved in the comprehensive design, financing, and execution of projects and bear substantial risks beyond mere completion of work. Despite the Tribunal's inclination to recognize the assessee as a developer, it noted deficiencies in the appellate record regarding detailed analyses of each project undertaken by the assessee. As such, the Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) for a comprehensive reevaluation of each project to conclusively determine the nature of the assessee's activities with respect to the criteria for a developer under Section 80IA(4).

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Deduction u/s 80IA - treating the assessee-company as a ‘Contractor’ and not ‘Developer’ by the Department - merely because in the agreement for development of...

  2. The ITAT Ahmedabad addressed a case involving a delay in filing an appeal against the denial of registration u/s 12A and 80G, impacting exemption u/s 11. The Tribunal...

  3. The assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80IA(4) was denied on the grounds that the assessee is not a developer of any infrastructure project but a simple works contractor...

  4. Disallowance of deduction u/s 80IA(4)(i) - The tribunal noted the distinction between a developer (who assumes significant risks and responsibilities for the project)...

  5. The assessee, a trust, claimed to be taxed at the same rate applicable to its beneficiary u/s 115BAA. However, this claim was dismissed as the assessee was not treated...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal u/s 249(4)(b) due to non-payment of advance tax. The assessee did not respond to the notice u/s 142(1) to clarify tax payment....

  7. Demand of service tax - The appellant argued that it was engaged in the construction of false ceilings and was a sub-contractor for the main contractor, who had...

  8. Sub-contractors liable to pay Service Tax even if main contractor pays tax on entire amount after 23.08.2007 circular, earlier confusion on issue. Appellant entered...

  9. The High Court addressed the issue of disallowance u/s. 80IA(4) to determine if the assessee was a contractor or a developer of infrastructure facilities. The Court...

  10. Deduction u/s 80IA - merely because in the agreement for development of infrastructure facility, assessee is referred to as contractor or because if some basic...

  11. The assessee, a contractor or developer, was initially denied deduction u/s 80IA(4) by the Assessing Officer, citing the retrospective amendment introduced by the...

  12. Disallowance of deduction u/s 80IB(10) and the levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c). The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction claim on two grounds: most residential units...

  13. Income accrued in India - Status of Non Resident - Determinative test for the status of Non Resident being number of days of stay in India and in assessee's case in...

  14. TDS u/s 194C - payment to works contract - MoU reveals that the work carried out by the developer / contractor was as per the requirements of the assessee - Demand...

  15. Decisions taken by the Board of Approval (BoA) for Special Economic Zones (SEZs) in its 119th meeting. Some notable points: - BoA approved conversion of processing areas...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates