Professional misconduct by CA - Liability of the Engagement ...

Audit Firm Penalized for Misconduct: Financial Penalties and Suspension for Neglecting Material Misstatements.

May 6, 2024

Case Laws Companies Law NFRA

Professional misconduct by CA - Liability of the Engagement partner with audit firm - Acceptance of the Audit Engagement - The NFRA concluded that the audit firm and the responsible auditors committed professional misconduct. This was established through their failure to adequately address and report material misstatements and their overall failure to perform their duties diligently. - As a result of the findings, the NFRA imposed significant penalties on the audit firm and the individual auditors involved. The firm was penalized financially, and the responsible auditors were barred from undertaking any audit work for specified periods.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Professional misconduct by CA - Liability of the Engagement ...

Audit Firm Penalized for Misconduct: Financial Penalties and Suspension for Neglecting Material Misstatements.

May 6, 2024

Case Laws Companies Law NFRA

You may also like:

Professional misconduct by CA - The NFRA concluded that the actions of the firm and the engagement partner constituted professional misconduct. They failed to cooperate...

Professional Misconduct by CA - Liability of the Engagement Partner (EP) with Audit Firm - The NFRA refuted the firm’s claims that only the EP was accountable,...

Professional Misconduct by CA - Liability of the Engagement Partner (EP) with Audit Firm - The NFRA found that the auditors did not adequately report the non-recognition...

Alleged professional misconduct by auditors involving diversion of funds, understatement of diverted funds, evergreening of loans through fund circulation, fraudulent...

Professional Misconduct - Acceptance of audit engagement disregarding Independence requirements - Tampering of Audit File and related lapses-SA 230, Audit Documentation...

The National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) held that the statutory auditors of Coffee Day Enterprises Limited (CDEL) committed professional misconduct u/s 132(4)...

Challenge to suspension order of State GST officer for issuing refund to a fake exporter without proper verification. Petitioner contests suspension citing lack of...

The NFRA held that the Auditors were grossly negligent and failed to exercise due diligence in the audit of a public interest entity, amounting to professional...

Professional Misconduct by CA - The NFRA found that the auditors neglected their duty to perform an independent and thorough audit. They overlooked critical signals of...

Professional misconduct - Debarment from being appointed as an auditor or internal auditor or from undertaking any audit - levy of penalty - The court observed that the...

Penalty U/s 271B - Failure to get accounts audited - Penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty u/s. 271(l)(c) - The words may direct that such person shall pay by way of penalty in section 271 leave a certain amount of discretion in imposition of penalty...

Professional Misconduct - Chartered Accountant (CA) - Lapses in evaluation of writing-back of liabilities - Failure in evaluation and attendance at physical verification...

Imposition of penalty on partners - penalty on partner is not imposable when the firm is penalised under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.

Fee payable to CA Firms, for Special Audits directed u/s 142(2A) - CA Firm registered as MSME - Recovery of fees due from the Income Tax Department invoking the...

Quick Updates: