Set-off of losses against income from other sources u/s 70 - ...

Court Rules in Favor of EOU: Section 10B Not Applicable, Notices Invalid, Losses Can Offset Other Income.

May 8, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Set-off of losses against income from other sources u/s 70 - Applicability of provision of section 10B - petitioner had the status of EOU for a period of 5 years - The High Court upheld the petitioner's contention that Section 10B was not applicable to them as they were a 100% EOU. - The Court, after considering submissions and legal precedents, ruled in favor of the petitioner, declaring the notices and orders as invalid. The Court affirmed the petitioner's right to set off losses under Section 70 and upheld their interpretation of the law.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Set-off of losses against income from other sources u/s 70 - ...

Court Rules in Favor of EOU: Section 10B Not Applicable, Notices Invalid, Losses Can Offset Other Income.

May 8, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Method of communication of notice - The High Court examined the provisions of Section 282(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 127(1) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962...

The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

ITAT ruled on long-term capital gains from unlisted shares under India-Mauritius DTAA, specifically addressing loss carry-forward without offsetting against capital...

The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

The High Court held that the reassessment order dated 12.05.2023 and subsequent proceedings were invalid as they were beyond the statutory limitation period prescribed...

Faceless assessment notices issued by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) held invalid due to non-compliance with Section 151A and...

Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

The High Court held that respondent No. 3 cannot avoid deciding the petitioners' application dated 20 December 2023 seeking an advance ruling on the taxability of sale...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for "non-genuine loss" on account of assessee's transactions in futures and options (F&O) was unjustified. The reasons recorded did not...

Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

Availment of CENVAT Credit - Non maintenance of separate account - When it is impossible to comply with the provisions of sub-rule (2) of Rule 6, it would not be...

Validity of faceless assessment challenged due to non-compliance with Section 151A - notices issued by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing...

The case pertains to the reopening of assessment u/s 147 regarding capital gains on the sale of land. The key issue was the apportionment of income between spouses...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 consequent to revision proceedings u/s 263 pending - notice u/s 148 issued during the pendency of the assessment proceedings following...

Quick Updates: