Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability - resident Indian ...

Executive Directors Liable for Cheque Dishonor: Court Affirms Accountability Under Negotiable Instruments and Companies Acts.

May 10, 2024

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability - resident Indian Director - The High Court observed that by virtue of being an Executive Director, the petitioner was presumed to be in charge and responsible for the company's operations under the NI Act and Companies Act. The court referenced several Supreme Court decisions to assert that the role of an Executive Director is distinctly accountable for the company's business conduct. The judgments clarified that persons holding managerial or directorial positions could be held accountable for corporate offenses unless they unequivocally demonstrate their non-involvement or exercise of due diligence. - Ultimately, the court dismissed the petitions, reaffirming the summons issued by the Trial Court.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability - resident Indian ...

Executive Directors Liable for Cheque Dishonor: Court Affirms Accountability Under Negotiable Instruments and Companies Acts.

May 10, 2024

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

You may also like:

Non-executive director's vicarious liability in a company u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act examined. For making a non-executive director liable, there must be...

The petition challenged the criminal complaint filed against the petitioner u/s 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonor of cheque. The...

Non-executive director's vicarious liability u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonor of cheques issued by the company examined. Specific averments and...

Dishonour of Cheque - Vicarious liability - petitioner is an Independent Non-Executive Director - - the petitioner was appointed as Additional Director and resigned as...

Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of the non-executive director - This Court is convinced that the complaint does not satisfy the requirements u/s.141 of the...

Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of director - The petitioners argued that they had resigned from their directorship well before the cheque was issued and could...

HC ruled that a Managing Director cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act for a dishonored cheque that was not drawn by their...

Dishonor of cheque case - vicarious liability of directors u/s 138 read with Sections 141 and 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Court held specific, unambiguous...

Dishonour of Cheque - existence of legally enforceable debt or liability - vicarious liability of nominee and non-executive directors - The contention does not cut much...

Dishonour of Cheque - Liability of a Director - principles of vicarious liability - petitioner had already resigned on 15.03.2014 as Director of the Company and was...

Dishonour of Cheque - mentioning the petitioners in CRR 196 of 2016 as ‘non-directors’ and in CRR 197 of 2016 as ‘directors’ - High Court held that, at the relevant...

SC held that non-executive directors cannot be held vicariously liable under Sections 138 and 141 of NI Act for dishonored cheques without specific evidence of their...

SC held that a non-executive director cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 141 of NI Act for dishonored cheques where he had resigned prior to the offense and...

Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of Director - The petitioners admit that the cheque was drawn by them and handed over to the respondent-complainant. However,...

An executive director, being a member of the board and responsible for overall management, cannot evade liability merely by claiming lack of involvement in day-to-day...

Quick Updates: