The case involved a dispute over the taxation of reimbursements, ...

Tax Tribunal Rules Security Force Benefits Non-Taxable; Overturns Time-Barred Tax Demand for 2009-2011 Period.

May 13, 2024

Case Laws Service Tax AT

The case involved a dispute over the taxation of reimbursements, excess pension contributions, and rent-free accommodation received by a security force providing services to a PSU. The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant on all counts. They held that reimbursements, excess pension contributions, and rent-free accommodation should not be considered as taxable considerations. Additionally, the Tribunal deemed the demand for the period April 2009 to March 2011 as time-barred due to the Appellant's good faith and reliance on legal interpretations.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involved a dispute over the taxation of reimbursements, ...

Tax Tribunal Rules Security Force Benefits Non-Taxable; Overturns Time-Barred Tax Demand for 2009-2011 Period.

May 13, 2024

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

The CESTAT ruled that the amount paid by the appellant towards advertisement and promotion of its own franchise outlets cannot be included in the value of taxable...

The Tribunal held that the appellant rightly issued credit notes to government entities that refused payment of consideration and service tax, allowing adjustment of...

The case involved the recovery of service tax in relation to various services, including transportation of goods through pipelines, erection, commissioning, and...

Tribunal held that cost of facilities provided by service recipient to Central Industrial Security Force for rendering security services, such as barrack accommodation,...

New Rules - Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018 came into force w.e.f. 13.6.2018

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the rejection of the assessee's claim for a lower tax rate u/s 115BAA due to non-filing of Form 10IC on time. The CIT(A) dismissed the...

The Department of Commerce (DoC) has issued clarifications regarding the newly inserted SEZ Rule 11B, notified on 6.12.2023, which allows the setup of non-SEZ IT/ITES...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Assessee company failed to deduct tax at source as reflected in Tax Auditor's report. Demand u/s 201(1)/201(14) was barred by limitation. Assessee submitted that...

The case involved a dispute over CENVAT Credit denial based on a board circular alleging undervaluation of assets and claiming dual benefits. The Circular merely advised...

CESTAT allowed appeal concerning service tax on payments made by appellant to overseas logistics agents. Tribunal held that pre-April 2006 demand of Rs. 11,97,047 was...

Rejection of refund claim - GTA Service - time limitation - The tribunal reaffirmed the previous tribunal orders that transportation of coal within and outside mining...

Validity of Assessment order as time barred - delay dispatching assessment order - The Tribunal, after considering the submissions and relevant precedents, concluded...

Filing of Form GST TRAN-1 - time limit for filing of the form - The time limit stipulated under Rule 117 of the Rules is not ultra vires of the Act. This Rule is...

Quick Updates: