The ITAT Delhi held that the CIT(A) erred in presuming all cash ...

Tax Tribunal Rules on Cash Deposits: Peak Credit Approach for Income Assessment Prevails Over Blanket Classification.

May 25, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT Delhi held that the CIT(A) erred in presuming all cash deposits as business receipts u/s 44AD. The CIT(A) treated deposits as business receipts and applied 8% net profit rate. The assessee argued for peak credits to be considered as income due to both deposits and withdrawals. The CIT DR sought to treat all cash deposits as undisclosed income without offsetting withdrawals, which was rejected. It was established that peak credit should be considered for undisclosed income when both credit and debit entries exist. The AO's addition of entire cash deposits without considering debit entries was deemed unjustified. The CIT DR failed to challenge the CIT(A)'s findings supported by the Investigation Wing's report on the assessee's business activity. The Revenue's grounds lacked merit and were dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT Delhi held that the CIT(A) erred in presuming all cash ...

Tax Tribunal Rules on Cash Deposits: Peak Credit Approach for Income Assessment Prevails Over Blanket Classification.

May 25, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The ITAT considered the issue of cash deposits and other credits in the assessee's saving bank account. The tribunal noted that the cash deposits were not made in a...

The case pertains to the reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 of the Income Tax Act due to undisclosed cash deposits in the assessee's bank accounts. The key points are:...

The case pertains to the addition of undisclosed income u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act, wherein the peak credit method was applied. The Commissioner of Income Tax...

Cash credit u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - cash deposit during demonetization period - assessee's failure to maintain books of accounts u/s 44AD. Held that where exemption from...

Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit - Other than Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, there is no other provision either in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 or in Central Excise...

The assessee's unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were deleted by the CIT(A) after accepting the submissions that the cash receipts from various sources like cash sales,...

The ITAT Bangalore addressed unexplained cash deposits u/s 69A, focusing on the credibility of earlier withdrawals as a source for redeposits. The Tribunal examined fund...

Denial of exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad), addition of unexplained cash credits u/s 69A. Registration granted u/s 12AA from 23-02-2019 indicating trust not exclusively...

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

Cash deposits made post demonetization represented unaccounted income of the assessee qua AY 2017-2018 - Having regard to the extensive material which has been examined...

Addition u/s 69A - Addition of cash deposits made by the assessee during the demonetization period - The Tribunal examined the legality of the assessment order, the...

Block assessment - seizure of unexplained cash - it would be justifiable to assess the peak credit of deposits as the income of the assessee. - AT

The Appellate Tribunal addressed two issues regarding TDS credit. Firstly, the Tribunal emphasized that income and TDS must align in any assessment year when income is...

The assessee, a septuagenarian gynecologist with no business income during the year, made cash deposits totaling Rs. 10 lakh in her bank account during demonetization....

Quick Updates: