Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2024 Year 2024 This

The ITAT Amritsar addressed the validity of initiating ...


Initiation of proceedings u/s 153C(1) instead of 143(3) invalid for AY 2020-21.

May 31, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The ITAT Amritsar addressed the validity of initiating proceedings u/s 153C(1) instead of 143(3). It was held that initiation of Section 153C occurs upon receiving seized documents by the AO with jurisdiction over the person. The tribunal noted that the initiation u/s 153C(1) was for AY 2021-22, not AY 2020-21, as the documents were handed over on 16-03-2021. Citing precedents like Jasjit Singh and RRJ Securities Ltd, the tribunal deemed the assessment order invalid and quashed it, setting aside the appeal order.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. ITAT quashed assessment order made under section 143(3) for AY 2021-22, declaring it void ab initio. The assessment, based on materials from search operations conducted...

  2. Validity of assessment made under Section 143(1) instead of section 153C - In the facts of the present appeal, undisputedly, the books of account/documents/assets found...

  3. The assessment year in question falls beyond the stipulated six assessment years and four relevant assessment years, rendering the notice issued by the Assessing Officer...

  4. The ITAT quashed the assessment order passed under section 143(3) dated 27/03/2015. The Tribunal held that since the satisfaction note for initiating proceedings under...

  5. ITAT determined that for proceedings under section 153C, the relevant assessment years should be AY 2017-18 to 2022-23, based on the satisfaction note recorded by AO on...

  6. A consolidated satisfaction note was prepared for multiple assessment years instead of separate notes, rendering the assessment proceedings u/s 153C invalid. The ITAT...

  7. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - order passed u/s. 201(1)/201(1A) or u/s. 143(3) - non deduction of tds - not passing order u/s 201(1) before initiation of proceedings u/s 271C...

  8. Validity of the assessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) - post search assessment - in the case on hand the pending reassessment proceedings u/s 147 got abated by...

  9. ITAT ruled against treating lease deposits and booking advances as cessation of liability under Section 41(1) of Income Tax Act. The 3 crore lease deposit was temporary,...

  10. Assessment framed u/s. 153C/263/143(3) - Such satisfaction note along with seized material is passed over to the ld. AO of ‘other person’. Thereafter, the ld.AO of the...

  11. Assessment u/s 153C versus 143 - Additions u/s 45 - Underreporting of sale consideration for immovable property while framing the Assessment Order u/s 143(3) - Whether...

  12. Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153C/143(3) against Settlement Commission order - The Tribunal found the reassessment to infringe upon the principles laid out by...

  13. Assessment order passed u/s 143(3) by issuing notice u/s 143(2) quashed as invalid. Assessment for relevant assessment year should have been carried out by issuing...

  14. Reassessment notices issued u/s 148 for assessment years 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21 were time-barred by limitation. Withdrawal of approval u/s 10(23C)(vi) by the...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - combined order of penalty for additions made vide order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. u/s 153A and u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 - AO required to initiate two...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates