The ITAT Amritsar addressed the validity of initiating ...

Initiation of proceedings u/s 153C(1) instead of 143(3) invalid for AY 2020-21.

Case Laws Income Tax

May 31, 2024

The ITAT Amritsar addressed the validity of initiating proceedings u/s 153C(1) instead of 143(3). It was held that initiation of Section 153C occurs upon receiving seized documents by the AO with jurisdiction over the person. The tribunal noted that the initiation u/s 153C(1) was for AY 2021-22, not AY 2020-21, as the documents were handed over on 16-03-2021. Citing precedents like Jasjit Singh and RRJ Securities Ltd, the tribunal deemed the assessment order invalid and quashed it, setting aside the appeal order.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT Amritsar addressed the validity of initiating ...

Initiation of proceedings u/s 153C(1) instead of 143(3) invalid for AY 2020-21.

Case Laws Income Tax

May 31, 2024

You may also like:

Validity of assessment made under Section 143(1) instead of section 153C - In the facts of the present appeal, undisputedly, the books of account/documents/assets found...

The assessment year in question falls beyond the stipulated six assessment years and four relevant assessment years, rendering the notice issued by the Assessing Officer...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - order passed u/s. 201(1)/201(1A) or u/s. 143(3) - non deduction of tds - not passing order u/s 201(1) before initiation of proceedings u/s 271C...

Assessment framed u/s. 153C/263/143(3) - Such satisfaction note along with seized material is passed over to the ld. AO of ‘other person’. Thereafter, the ld.AO of the...

Validity of the assessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) - post search assessment - in the case on hand the pending reassessment proceedings u/s 147 got abated by...

Reassessment notices issued u/s 148 for assessment years 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21 were time-barred by limitation. Withdrawal of approval u/s 10(23C)(vi) by the...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153C/143(3) against Settlement Commission order - The Tribunal found the reassessment to infringe upon the principles laid out by...

Assessment order passed u/s 143(3) by issuing notice u/s 143(2) quashed as invalid. Assessment for relevant assessment year should have been carried out by issuing...

Assessment u/s 153C versus 143 - Additions u/s 45 - Underreporting of sale consideration for immovable property while framing the Assessment Order u/s 143(3) - Whether...

Assessment proceedings u/s 153C - The period of limitation and deemed date for possession of seized documents were discussed. It was held that the date of recording...

The High Court quashed the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 and the consequent initiation of reassessment proceedings, ruling in favor of the assessee. The key points...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - combined order of penalty for additions made vide order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. u/s 153A and u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 - AO required to initiate two...

Processing of invalid return u/s 143(1) - Denial of exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) - non-filing of ITR-V within 120 days made the assessee’s return as ‘invalid’ being...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153(1) - Period of limitation - In this case, since, the Assessing Officer cannot invoke jurisdiction u/s.144C(1) and pass draft...

Adjustment u/s 143(1) disallowing revenue expenditure claim u/s 11(1) was made without providing reasonable opportunity to assessee, violating second Proviso of Section...

Quick Updates: