CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that the Appellant is entitled to benefit ...

Service tax demand on logistic charges and toll collection was set aside. Benefit of Rule 6(3A) of cenvat credit rules cannot be denied.

Case Laws Service Tax

June 1, 2024

CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that the Appellant is entitled to benefit u/s Rule 6(3A) of CCR, 2004 even if the option wasn't initially exercised. Service tax on logistic charges was set aside as VAT was paid. Demand on toll collection was also set aside. New demands for 2015-16 and 2016-17 were not sustainable. No short payment on works contract services. Incentives received were not taxable under business auxiliary services. Demand for 2012-13 to 2014-15 was not sustainable due to limitation. Interest and penalty not imposable if demand is not sustainable. Partial demand confirmed under Rule 6(3)(A) was set aside. Appeals allowed with consequential relief.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that the Appellant is entitled to benefit ...

Service tax demand on logistic charges and toll collection was set aside. Benefit of Rule 6(3A) of cenvat credit rules cannot be denied.

Case Laws Service Tax

June 1, 2024

You may also like:

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Levy of Service Tax - liquidated damages received - The demand of service tax on late payment surcharge meter renting charges and supervision charges are set aside. The...

Non-payment of service tax on management consultancy services, royalty services, intellectual property right services, business auxiliary services, and banking and...

Business Auxiliary Services - collection of toll charges on behalf of CIDBI or not - there was no such commission paid at all - demand set aside - AT

Demand for service tax on commission received on vehicle sales, sales promotion, and incentives under 'Business Auxiliary Services' set aside as show cause notice failed...

Various Service tax issues related to different activities undertaken by the appellant. The key points are: service tax demand on operation and maintenance of ropeway...

The Tribunal held that the amount collected under Interest Free Maintenance Security and Annual Maintenance Charges was refundable and not for providing services, hence...

Liability to pay service tax for services provided to a foreign entity. The appellant argued that their turnover within the domestic market was below the threshold...

Once the service provider has paid the tax under reverse charge mechanism, service tax cannot be demanded from the appellant - demand of service with penalty set aside - AT

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered the levy of service tax on air and ocean freight charges collected before and after 01.07.2012. The issue was whether these...

Short payment of service tax on GTA services under reverse charge mechanism, reimbursement of expenses not liable to service tax. Appellant providing GTA services,...

Exemption from GST - intra-state supply of services - Services by way of access to a road or a bridge on payment of toll charges falling under the heading 9967 -...

The appellant challenged the levy of service tax on Road Cutting Charges, Land Application Processing Charges, and Street Light Charges. The Tribunal held that Road...

Valuation - third party inspection charges cannot be included in transaction value - Supreme Court held cost of transportation from place of removal to delivery excluded...

Service tax refund claim allowed by Appellate Tribunal for additional service tax paid on charges recovered from customers. Appellant issued credit notes to customers...

Quick Updates: