Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2024 Year 2024 This

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, ...


Financial Default and Demand Notice upheld as per IBC provisions. OTS failure justifies insolvency. Creditor's conduct held as fair.

Case Laws     Insolvency and Bankruptcy

June 3, 2024

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi addressed issues regarding debt default, impact of One Time Settlement (OTS) Agreement, and Financial Creditor's conduct. The Tribunal found the Financial Creditor's claim of Rs. 58.38 Crores valid based on loan agreements and evidence of default. The failure to adhere to OTS terms justified insolvency proceedings despite initial intent to settle. Financial Creditor's actions were deemed lawful, with no evidence of bad faith. The Adjudicating Authority's decision to admit the Company Petition and initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was upheld due to clear debt admission and default exceeding Rs.1 crore. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the initiation of CIRP.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Appellant (SIDBI) had established a clear case of continuous defaults by the Respondent (Sambandh Finserve Private Limited) in loan repayment post the suspension...

  2. The NCLAT upheld the admission of the Section 7 application filed by the Financial Creditor (Respondent No.1) for initiating CIRP against the Corporate Debtor. It held...

  3. Maintainability of petition seeking initiation of CIRP against Personal Guarantor/Respondent - invocation of Bank guarantee and time limitation - The case involved an...

  4. Service of original demand notice from the petitioner - Failure on the part of the petitioner to produce the original demand notice, along with the appeal memorandum...

  5. Initiation of CIRP - Financial creditor within the meaning of sub-section (7) of Section 5 of the IBC - The Supreme Court affirmed the NCLAT’s judgment, holding that the...

  6. The CD defaulted on loan repayment from January 2020, failing to pay the monthly installment due on 20th January 2020. Though partial payment was made in February 2020,...

  7. This legal summary concerns the maintainability of a Section 7 application for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a Corporate Debtor....

  8. Petition u/s 7 of IBC maintainable despite lack of evidence to show loan due and payable or record of default or demand letter. Adjudicating Authority only required to...

  9. Initiation of CIRP - It is also an admitted fact that there are no documents/records to prove that the Appellant is a Financial Creditor. The Appellant stated that the...

  10. The summary focuses on the dismissal of an appeal challenging the rejection of an insolvency application u/s 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The key...

  11. Admission of section 7 application - financial debt or not - The Tribunal affirmed that the disbursal of ₹5 crores to the corporate debtor by the financial...

  12. Section 53(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) provides for the order of priority in the distribution of liquidation assets. Financial debts owed to unsecured...

  13. Initiation of CIRP - NCLT returned the application of the Financial Creditor instead of adjudicating on the Company petition - the Appellant has issued a demand notice...

  14. Refusal to stay the proceedings initiated by the Respondent, Axis Bank Limited against the Appellant - The title “Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code” makes it amply clear...

  15. The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates