The case involved valuation of imported goods, undervaluation, ...

CESTAT ruled on valuation of imported goods, admissibility of statements u/s 108, documentary evidence, computer printouts, undervaluation, extended limitation period, confiscation, and penalties.

Case Laws     Customs

June 6, 2024

The case involved valuation of imported goods, undervaluation, admissibility of appellant's statement u/s 108, documentary evidence, computer printouts u/s 138C, recovery of customs duty and penalties u/s 114A, 114AA, 112(a)(ii), and 112(b)(ii) of Customs Act. The appellant's statement was held voluntary, supported by documents. Computer printouts were admissible. Undervaluation was proven. Extended limitation period applied due to intent to evade duty. Confiscation upheld due to misdeclaration. Penalties u/s 112, 114A, 114AA imposed for willful suppression. Past imports valuation not upheld. Appeal partially allowed.

View Source