The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving penalty u/s ...

Assessee not penalized for inaccurate income details as taxes were paid early & explanation was genuine.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 8, 2024

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Assessee did not disclose non-eligibility of brought forward losses in the return. The Assessee voluntarily paid additional taxes before assessment proceedings. The Tribunal held that the Assessee's actions were not deliberate inaccuracies. The Tribunal found no concealment or inaccurate particulars at the time of filing the return. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's claim that the Assessee could have claimed a refund if not selected for scrutiny. The Tribunal emphasized that the Assessee's explanation was bona fide and that the penalty under u/s 271(1)(c) was not justified. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, stating that the conditions for imposing the penalty were not met.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving penalty u/s ...

Assessee not penalized for inaccurate income details as taxes were paid early & explanation was genuine.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 8, 2024

You may also like:

Income assessed in hands of Appellant as Representative Assessee. No credit for prepaid taxes availed by beneficiaries. JCIT(A) directed AO to verify claim of prepaid...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Explanation is bonafide is, we find, supported by the fact that during assessment proceedings the assessee, realizing his mistake even before...

Assessee employed by Indian entity but sent on long-term international assignment to Singapore. Salary received in India for administrative reasons, but employment...

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

Interest u/s 234B - The term “assessed tax” has been defined in Explanation-1 of Section 234B (1). As per said Explanation-1 “assessed tax” means the tax on the total...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - unexplained share application money and unsecured loans - No incriminating material was found during the curse of search relating to the alleged...

The assessee failed to file the original return of income, and the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings for underreporting income. The assessee's authorized...

The assessee had been following the mercantile system of accounting, wherein book profits are taken for tax assessment, though credit or debit amounts may not be...

Penalty order u/s 271AAA - disclosure of additions income pursuant to search u/s 132 - In the present case the assessee has disclosed the entire source of income and...

Higher rate of tax @60% u/s 115BBE - though the alleged surrendered income is a business income but since assessee being individual having no limitation of earning...

The case pertains to the levy of interest u/s 234C for failure on the part of the payer to deduct tax deducted at source (TDS) u/ss 196D and 194LD. The key points are:...

Penalty order u/s 271AAB for treating an amount included in the Return of Income as 'undisclosed income' was found unjustified. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...

Interest income on tax refund, though required to be reported under 'income from other sources', was erroneously shown as business income by assessee firm. Despite...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - failure on the part of legal heir of the deceased assessee to explain the source of part of the deposits - The mere failure on the part of the...

Quick Updates: