The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving penalty u/s ...

Tribunal Rules No Penalty for Assessee's Honest Mistake in Tax Filing, Dismissing Revenue's Claim of Inaccurate Income Disclosure.

June 8, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Assessee did not disclose non-eligibility of brought forward losses in the return. The Assessee voluntarily paid additional taxes before assessment proceedings. The Tribunal held that the Assessee's actions were not deliberate inaccuracies. The Tribunal found no concealment or inaccurate particulars at the time of filing the return. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's claim that the Assessee could have claimed a refund if not selected for scrutiny. The Tribunal emphasized that the Assessee's explanation was bona fide and that the penalty under u/s 271(1)(c) was not justified. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, stating that the conditions for imposing the penalty were not met.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving penalty u/s ...

Tribunal Rules No Penalty for Assessee's Honest Mistake in Tax Filing, Dismissing Revenue's Claim of Inaccurate Income Disclosure.

June 8, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

100% EOU - Confirmation of demand and levy of penalty - The Tribunal was right in stating that the intention of the assessee was not as that of an honest tax payer as...

Assessee's appeal allowed by ITAT against penalty u/s 271B for non-compliance with Section 44AB. Assessee demonstrated reasonable cause for failure to file return and...

The assessee had not obtained and furnished the Audit Report from the Accountant within the due date. The Tribunal held that the levy of penalty u/s 271B is not...

The High Court dismissed the petition seeking rectification of mistake in filing the wrong income tax return (ITR) format, as the assessee had full knowledge of filing...

Foreign Tax Credit u/s. 90 - Assessee did not file Form 67 at the time of filing of her return of income - Referring to established case law, the Tribunal affirmed that...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee's application for registration u/s 80G was filed within the statutory time limit. The Tribunal directed the...

Assessee's claim for foreign tax credit u/s 90 allowed despite delay in filing Form No. 67 after due date of filing return u/s 139(1). Delay in filing Form 67 cannot...

The ITAT rejected the Revenue's appeal concerning disallowance of exemption under s.10(23C)(vi). The Tribunal accepted the assessee's contention that the AO failed to...

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

The appeal filed by the assessee company was dismissed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on the grounds that the Form 36 (memo of appeal) was not duly verified as per...

Mandatory e-filing of ST return by all the assessee - Service Tax rules, 1994 amended.

Tribunal found assessee had reasonable cause for delay in furnishing Tax Audit Report due to delay in finalization of statutory audit arising from dispute between Board...

The ITAT held that where the assessee entered into a unilateral Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and complied with its...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an assessee can claim deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the first time in the return...

Quick Updates: