The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of reopening ...

Reopening of assessment due to unexplained cash deposits. Assessee failed to provide details. Tribunal limits income estimation to 15%.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 11, 2024

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of reopening assessment u/s 147 and estimation of income from cash deposits u/s 69A. The Tribunal noted that the assessee failed to comply with notices explaining the source of deposits. The CIT(A) mentioned that returns were filed after receiving notice u/s 148, but there was no evidence that the returns were treated as non-est by the AO. The assessee did not provide necessary details to the AO due to business cessation and joining government service. The Tribunal found that the assessee had filed returns for previous years and directed the AO to apply a net profit rate of 15% on total deposits for taxation, partially allowing the appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of reopening ...

Reopening of assessment due to unexplained cash deposits. Assessee failed to provide details. Tribunal limits income estimation to 15%.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 11, 2024

You may also like:

Cash deposits in bank account unexplained - assessee failed to substantiate source for deficit amount - reasons recorded for reopening assessment valid - addition partly...

The case pertains to the reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 of the Income Tax Act due to undisclosed cash deposits in the assessee's bank accounts. The key points are:...

Unexplained money u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE(1) - no explanation regarding source of cash deposit in savings account - case selected for limited scrutiny, thus...

Deposits by the assessee in bank account during demonetization period were not unexplained. Section 69A is inapplicable as there were proper entries for cash sales, cash...

Cash credit u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - cash deposit during demonetization period - assessee's failure to maintain books of accounts u/s 44AD. Held that where exemption from...

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposits - onus to prove - The Pr. CIT found the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue's interests due to...

Validity of reopening the assessment u/s 147 - Additions u/s 68 and u/s 69A - Cash deposits in assessee’s bank account - The ITAT observed that, the AO was satisfied...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - additions of cash deposits - The Tribunal held that, the Assessing Officer has treated the cash deposit merely on the basis of human...

Unexplained cash deposits in bank - receipt of rental deposits in cash - The fact remains that the cash rental deposits have been received by the assessee which is not...

Cash deposit during demonetization period treated as unexplained cash credit. Assessee's claim of introducing cash as capital in proprietary concern not accepted due to...

The case concerns the reopening of assessment u/s 147 based on information from the Non-filers Monitoring System (NMS) about cash deposits in the assessee's bank account....

The ITAT Bangalore addressed unexplained cash deposits u/s 69A, focusing on the credibility of earlier withdrawals as a source for redeposits. The Tribunal examined fund...

Assessee failed to file return of income u/s 139 but received notice u/s 148. Despite opting for presumptive taxation scheme u/s 44AD, which does not require maintaining...

Unexplained investment - Primary onus - The assessee has deposited cash in its ICICI Bank account on various occasions, and onus is very heavy on assessee to explain...

Quick Updates: