Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2024 Year 2024 This

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of ...


Assessee filed appeal physically before due date. Difficulty in e-filing acknowledged by CBDT. Appeal should be admitted and decided on merits.

Case Laws     Income Tax

June 17, 2024

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of physical/manual filing of appeal u/s the Income Tax Rules. Assessee argued inability to e-file due to lack of assistance and incomplete requirements. Tribunal noted physical filing before due date and CBDT's extension of e-filing time limit due to difficulties. Held that physical filing was valid, directing CIT(A) to admit and decide the appeal on merits, providing ample hearing opportunity to the assessee. Remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The High Court dismissed the petition seeking rectification of mistake in filing the wrong income tax return (ITR) format, as the assessee had full knowledge of filing...

  2. The assessee delayed filing the TDS statement, leading to late fees u/s 234E. The Assessing Officer issued an order u/s 200A regarding the late filing. The assessee...

  3. Condonation of delay of 349 days in filing the present appeal - when the ld. CIT(A) has decided the appeal of the assessee vide impugned ex-parte order, the delay in...

  4. The assessee filed an original return u/s 139(4) and later discovered an omission, wrongly claiming deduction u/s 57 for interest paid on borrowed capital under 'Income...

  5. Denial of benefit u/s 115BAA of reduced rate of tax @22% - Domestic Companies - Condonation of delay in filing of Form No. 10-IC by the assessee - The Appellate Tribunal...

  6. Penalty u/s.271AAB - Belated filing of regular return after search - Penalty cannot be levied u/s.271AAB of the Act, in respect of income disclosed in regular return of...

  7. Deduction u/s. 80IB(10) - non filling of return on time - the ITAT held that the return filed beyond the due date cannot claim deduction under section 80IB(10) as per...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s 148 - No difference between returned income and assessed income - Assessee voluntarily...

  9. The assessee, a works contractor, filed a return in compliance with Section 153A notice and claimed deduction u/s 80IA, which was not claimed in the original return...

  10. Penalty imposed u/s 271B for delay in filing the return. The key points are: The assessee failed to get accounts audited as per Section 44AB. The penalty order u/s 271B...

  11. Deduction u/s. 80P - hardship to file e-return of income - login problem - In the instant case the assessee faced genuine hardship, which mainly arised on account of...

  12. Appeal filed against the deceased assessee - revised form no. 36 is filed belatedly - once the Tribunal has granted the leave to the revenue for filing the revised form...

  13. Filing of Form 10-IE to opt for the new tax regime u/s 115BAC is directory, not mandatory. If filed before assessment, the Assessing Officer must consider it. The...

  14. Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

  15. Exemption u/s 11 - assessee has not e-filed or not filed return within due date - The NFAC/Ld.CIT(A) ruled in favor of the Assessee, stating that the CBDT circular...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates