The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of ...

Assessee filed appeal physically before due date. Difficulty in e-filing acknowledged by CBDT. Appeal should be admitted and decided on merits.

June 17, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of physical/manual filing of appeal u/s the Income Tax Rules. Assessee argued inability to e-file due to lack of assistance and incomplete requirements. Tribunal noted physical filing before due date and CBDT's extension of e-filing time limit due to difficulties. Held that physical filing was valid, directing CIT(A) to admit and decide the appeal on merits, providing ample hearing opportunity to the assessee. Remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of ...

Assessee filed appeal physically before due date. Difficulty in e-filing acknowledged by CBDT. Appeal should be admitted and decided on merits.

June 17, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The High Court dismissed the petition seeking rectification of mistake in filing the wrong income tax return (ITR) format, as the assessee had full knowledge of filing...

The Tribunal held that late filing fee u/s 234E was not leviable on the assessee. The assessee had filed the relevant return within the due date on 22.10.2021, which was...

The assessee delayed filing the TDS statement, leading to late fees u/s 234E. The Assessing Officer issued an order u/s 200A regarding the late filing. The assessee...

Condonation of delay of 349 days in filing the present appeal - when the ld. CIT(A) has decided the appeal of the assessee vide impugned ex-parte order, the delay in...

The assessee filed an original return u/s 139(4) and later discovered an omission, wrongly claiming deduction u/s 57 for interest paid on borrowed capital under 'Income...

Denial of benefit u/s 115BAA of reduced rate of tax @22% - Domestic Companies - Condonation of delay in filing of Form No. 10-IC by the assessee - The Appellate Tribunal...

Penalty u/s.271AAB - Belated filing of regular return after search - Penalty cannot be levied u/s.271AAB of the Act, in respect of income disclosed in regular return of...

Deduction u/s. 80IB(10) - non filling of return on time - the ITAT held that the return filed beyond the due date cannot claim deduction under section 80IB(10) as per...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s 148 - No difference between returned income and assessed income - Assessee voluntarily...

Assessee's appeal allowed by ITAT against penalty u/s 271B for non-compliance with Section 44AB. Assessee demonstrated reasonable cause for failure to file return and...

The assessee, a works contractor, filed a return in compliance with Section 153A notice and claimed deduction u/s 80IA, which was not claimed in the original return...

Penalty imposed u/s 271B for delay in filing the return. The key points are: The assessee failed to get accounts audited as per Section 44AB. The penalty order u/s 271B...

Deduction u/s. 80P - hardship to file e-return of income - login problem - In the instant case the assessee faced genuine hardship, which mainly arised on account of...

Appeal filed against the deceased assessee - revised form no. 36 is filed belatedly - once the Tribunal has granted the leave to the revenue for filing the revised form...

ITAT partly allowed assessee's appeal. On revenue recognition issue, ITAT held AO made due enquiries, no lack of enquiry, decided in favour of assessee. On disallowance...

Quick Updates: