Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court considered a challenge to a notice u/s 226(3) for ...


High Court Rules No Separate Notice Needed for Secondary Holders in Joint Accounts u/s 226(3.

June 18, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

The High Court considered a challenge to a notice u/s 226(3) for attachment of joint saving accounts. The petitioners, secondary account holders, argued they were farmers who jointly cultivated land with their uncle and sold crops. They claimed no notice u/s 226(3)(iii) was given before attaching the account. The Court found that since the primary account holder was a defaulter, no separate notice was required for the secondary account holders. The notice must be sent to the defaulter, not joint account holders. The petition was dismissed, suggesting the petitioners seek legal recourse if they disagree with the attachment.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Recovery proceedings u/s 226(3)(iii) - attachment (Lien) of bank account - No notice issued to joint account holder - The mandatory requirement is not complied with by...

  2. Recovery of dues - Notice u/s 226(3) - Once the third party noticee has disputed that he owes any money or holds any money on account of the assessee, the Assessing...

  3. Stay of Recovery proceedings - Prayer quashing 226(3) notice - The prayer sought for by the petitioner, for a certiorarified mandamus quashing 226(3) notice, is thus not...

  4. Recovery proceedings - Notice u/s 226(3) - After declaration of Moratorium under Section 14(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 institution of other...

  5. Recovery of Tax - notice u/s 226(3) - An error in the figure, in a notice of demand does not vitiate the demand. - HC

  6. The AT dismissed the appeal challenging the provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. It held that the confirmation of the order...

  7. Attachment of petitioner's bank accounts and rental income u/s 226(3) - the attachment order 17.10.2012 is quashed & given liberty to pass a fresh speaking order - HC

  8. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of the notice issued under Section 142(1) - if the assessee really had no connection with the Swiss Bank accounts,...

  9. Recovery of dues - Justification issuing notice u/s 226(3) - the Authority has to necessarily wait till the the expiry of appeal time - HC

  10. NEEDED URGENTLY - A COMPLETELY NEW ST-3 RETURN FORMAT - Article

  11. CENVAT Credit - Separate Accounts - Prima facie it was impossible for the Appellants to maintain separate account and inventory of Zinc Skimming used for manufacture of...

  12. Appellants engaged in manufacturing dutiable goods and providing exempted trading services failed to maintain separate accounts for input services utilized in both...

  13. SEBI issued a circular revising and revamping nomination facilities for demat accounts and mutual fund folios. Key points: Reiteration of Existing Norms: - Rule of...

  14. Cash Credit Accounts cannot be attached u/s 226(3) of the Act as there is no relationship of 'debtor and creditor' between the bank and the customer. In a Cash Credit...

  15. Validity of Show cause notice - jurisdiction - Inadmissible transitional credit - Education Cess (E Cess) - Secondary & Higher Education Cess (SHE Cess) - Krishi Kalyan...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates