The case involves an appeal before CESTAT regarding continuation ...

Appeal halted due to Insolvency Resolution Plan approval by NCLT. Tribunal rules appeal abates, following Rule 22.

Case Laws Customs

June 24, 2024

The case involves an appeal before CESTAT regarding continuation post Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under IBC, 2016. NCLT approved a Resolution Plan during the appeal. CESTAT Mumbai, citing Rule 22 of CESTAT Rules, held that appeal abates upon IRP appointment and Resolution Plan approval. It emphasized that Tribunal's powers are limited by statute and rules. The decision aligns with legal precedent that Tribunal must act within statutory bounds. Therefore, the appeal abates as per Rule 22, in accordance with prescribed relief.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involves an appeal before CESTAT regarding continuation ...

Appeal halted due to Insolvency Resolution Plan approval by NCLT. Tribunal rules appeal abates, following Rule 22.

Case Laws Customs

June 24, 2024

You may also like:

CESTAT (Appellate Tribunal) addressed whether appeals continue post initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and approval of Resolution plan u/s...

Once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan remain payable. This...

The High Court examined the issue of liability to clear statutory dues post-insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016. The resolution plan...

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) has overriding effects over other laws as per Section 238. After approval of the Resolution Plan by NCLT, pending...

The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

Once the resolution plan is approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, any outstanding claims, including those under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act for...

The ITAT Chandigarh addressed the validity of income tax proceedings against a dissolved/insolvent company. The tribunal held that under Section 31 of the Insolvency and...

Approval of a resolution plan - The Tribunal dismissed objections raised by dissenting homebuyers, citing that since the homebuyers as a class assented to the plans,...

Legality and validity of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Approval of resolution plan for insolvency - If the Revenue is dissatisfied in any...

The High Court held that once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan...

CIRP - Delay in making claim - The case revolved around a Homebuyer's appeal regarding the delay in submitting their claim in an insolvency resolution process. Despite...

A resolution plan was approved for the petitioner on 26.03.2021 under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) demanded...

Approval of Resolution Plan - Validity of the order of Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) wherein it held that Rishima cannot be called as a Financial Creditor and Rishima...

Challenge to an interim arbitral award u/s 31(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The key issues are: (1) whether the rejection of an application u/s 16...

Recovery of excise duty, which got extinguished on approval of resolution plan - Section 31(1) of the IBC, 2016 mandates that the resolution plan approved by the NCLT...

Quick Updates: