The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 for alleged ...

Addition of bogus LTCG disallowed due to off-market purchase in cash. Exemption denied as payments were non-verifiable. Upheld by ITAT.

June 25, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 for alleged bogus Long Term Capital Gains due to off-market cash purchase of shares. The taxpayer's claim for deduction u/s 10(38) was disallowed as the purchase payments lacked verifiable proof through normal banking channels. Despite holding the shares for over a year and paying STT on sale, the exemption was denied due to unverifiable cash purchases. The Tribunal found the transactions suspicious, considering the lack of credible documentation and the taxpayer's atypical share investment behavior. The decision affirmed the CIT(A)'s ruling against the taxpayer, emphasizing the need for proper sourcing evidence in such cases.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 for alleged ...

Addition of bogus LTCG disallowed due to off-market purchase in cash. Exemption denied as payments were non-verifiable. Upheld by ITAT.

June 25, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Addition u/s 68 - bogus LTCG - off market purchase in physical form by paying cash - The assessee has failed to furnish the proof of source for the purchase transactions...

Additions towards Bogus purchases - Estimation of profit - Purchases are to be removed, the corresponding sale is also required to be removed from the profit and loss...

Addition of bogus purchases - The CIT (A) came to the conclusion that it is a case of purchases from gray market and thereafter, bills have been procured from hawala...

The assessee provided documentary evidence supporting the purchase and subsequent sale of shares leading to long-term capital gains (LTCG). The evidence included...

Bogus purchases - addition made u/s 69C - assessee is making local purchases without any transportation bills, delivery challans etc., the possibility of the Assessee...

Bogus purchases - accommodation entry - at best it would be a case that purchases have been made from one party in grey market and bills have been obtained from another...

Bogus purchases - CIT- A estimated profit from Hawala purchases by disallowing only 12.5% of the bogus purchases - Anyhow, on seeing the facts and circumstances, it...

Addition made u/s 68 - Bogus LTCG - unexplained cash credits - suspicious transactions in shares - penny stock - The Tribunal ultimately upheld the AO's decision to...

Bogus LTCG - exemption u/s 10(38) denied - The AO contended that the LTCG was undisclosed income arising from alleged manipulation in penny stocks. However, the assessee...

Purchase of material in the grey market - the addition, which could be made, was to account for profit element embedded in these purchase transactions to factorize for...

Bogus purchase - The supplier parties to whom cheque payments were made for purchases booked in books of account, returns the corresponding cash back to the assessee...

Estimation of income - bogus purchases - when the purchases are held to be bogus and only certain percentage only to be disallowed - assessee has already declared profit...

Addition being unverified sundry debtors - Additions have been confirmed on account of bogus purchases - Any addition out of the sales made out of the aforesaid...

Bogus purchases - addition @ 12.5% of the bogus purchases - accommodation entries - no actual delivery of goods - notices issued u/s 133(6) were returned back unserved...

Bogus LTCG - addition u/s 68 - exemption of LTCG u/s 10(38) - penny stock - neither the assessee nor his broker are named as illegitimate beneficiary to bogus LTCG in...

Quick Updates: